The situation was saved by the wisdom and moderation of the papal legate, and the loyalty of William Marshal, who forgot his interests as Earl of Pembroke in his devotion to the house of Anjou.  From the moment of John’s death at Newark, the cardinal and the marshal took the lead.  They met at Worcester, where the tyrant was buried, and at once made preparations for the coronation of Henry of Winchester.  The ceremony took place at St. Peter’s Abbey, Gloucester, on October 28, from which day the new reign was reckoned as beginning.  The marshal, who had forty-three years before dubbed the “young king” Henry a knight, then for a second time admitted a young king Henry to the order of chivalry.  When the king had recited the coronation oath and performed homage to the pope, Gualo anointed him and placed on his head the plain gold circlet that perforce did duly for a crown.[1] Next day Henry’s leading supporters performed homage, and before November 1 the marshal was made justiciar.

[1] There is some conflict of evidence on this point, and Dr. Stubbs, following Wendover, iv., 2, makes Peter of Winchester crown Henry.  But the official account in Faedera, i., 145, is confirmed by Ann.  Tewkesbury, p. 62; Histoire de G. le Marechal, lines 15329-32; Hist. des ducs de Normandie, et des rois d’Angleterre, p. 181, and Ann.  Winchester, p. 83.  Wykes, p. 60, and Ann.  Dunstable, p. 48, which confirm Wendover, are suspect by reason of other errors.

On November 2 a great council met at Bristol.  Only four earls appeared, and one of these, William of Fors, Earl of Albemarle, was a recent convert.  But the presence of eleven bishops showed that the Church had espoused the cause of the little king, and a throng of western and marcher magnates made a sufficient representation of the lay baronage.  The chief business was to provide for the government during the minority.  Gualo withstood the temptation to adopt the method by which Innocent III. had ruled Sicily in the name of Frederick II.  The king’s mother was too unpopular and incompetent to anticipate the part played by Blanche of Castile during the minority of St. Louis.  After the precedents set by the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem, the barons took the matter into their own hands.  Their work of selection was not an easy one.  Randolph of Chester was by far the most powerful of the royalist lords, but his turbulence and purely personal policy, not less than his excessive possessions and inordinate palatine jurisdictions, made him unsuitable for the regency.  Yet had he raised any sort of claim, it would have been hardly possible to resist his pretensions.[1] Luckily, Randolph stood aside, and his withdrawal gave the aged earl marshal the position for which his nomination as justiciar at Gloucester had already marked him out.  The title of regent was as yet unknown, either in England or France, but the style, “ruler of king and kingdom,” which the