These are the voices which we hear in solitude, but they grow faint and inaudible as we enter into the world.  Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members.  Society is a joint-stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the eater.  The virtue in most request is conformity.  Self-reliance is its aversion.  It loves not realities and creators, but names and customs.

Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist.[165] He who would gather immortal palms must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must explore if it be goodness.[166] Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.  Absolve you to yourself, and you shall have the suffrage[167] of the world.  I remember an answer which when quite young I was prompted to make to a valued adviser, who was wont to importune me with the dear old doctrines of the church.  On my saying, What have I to do with the sacredness of traditions, if I live wholly from within? my friend suggested:  “But these impulses may be from below, not from above.”  I replied:  “They do not seem to me to be such; but if I am the Devil’s child, I will live then from the Devil.”  No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature.  Good and bad are but names very readily transferable to that or this;[168] the only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it.  A man is to carry himself in the presence of all opposition, as if everything were titular and ephemeral but he.  I am ashamed to think how easily we capitulate to badges and names, to large societies and dead institutions.  Every decent and well-spoken individual affects and sways me more than is right.  I ought to go upright and vital, and speak the rude truth in all ways.  If malice and vanity wear the coat of philanthropy, shall that pass?  If an angry bigot assumes this bountiful cause of Abolition, and comes to me with his last news from Barbadoes,[169] why should I not say to him:  “Go love thy infant; love thy wood-chopper:  be good-natured and modest:  have that grace; and never varnish your hard, uncharitable ambition with this incredible tenderness for black folk a thousand miles off.  Thy love afar is spite at home.”  Rough and graceless would be such greeting, but truth is handsomer than the affectation of love.  Your goodness must have some edge to it,—­else it is none.  The doctrine of hatred must be preached as the counteraction of the doctrine of love when that pules and whines.  I shun father and mother and wife and brother, when my genius calls me.  I would write on the lintels of the door-post, Whim.[170] I hope it is somewhat better than whim at last, but we cannot spend the day in explanation.  Expect me not to show cause why I seek or why I exclude company.  Then, again, do not tell me, as a good man did to-day, of my obligation to put all poor men in good situations.  Are they