monsters, as to make one shudder at the thought of swallowing a drop”—­the orrery, the daguerreotype, and the diving-bell, (in which he had the courage to descend,) as the objects principally deserving notice, “since it would require several months, if not years, to give that attention to each specimen of human industry which it demands, in order thoroughly to understand it.”  The effects of the electrical machine, indeed, “by which fire was made to pass through the body of a man, and out of the finger-ends of his right hand, without his being in any way affected by it, though a piece of cloth, placed close to this right hand, was actually ignited,” seem to have excited considerable astonishment in his mind; but it does not appear that his curiosity led him to make any attempt in investigating the hidden causes of these mysterious phenomena.  His apathy in this respect presents a strong contrast with the minute and elaborate description of the same objects, the mode of their construction, and the uses to which they may be applied, given in the journal of the two Parsees, Nowrojee and Merwanjee.  “To us,” say they, “brought up in India for scientific pursuits, and longing ardently to acquire practical information connected with modern improvements, more particularly with naval architecture, steam-engines, steam-boats, and steam navigation, these two galleries of practical science (the Adelaide and Polytechnic) seemed to embrace all that we had come over to England to make ourselves acquainted with; and it was with gratitude to the original projectors of these institutions that we gazed on the soul-exciting scene before us.  We thought of the enchantments related in the Arabian Nights’ Entertainments, and they faded away into nothingness compared with what we then saw.”

But however widely apart the nonchalance of the Moslem, and the matter-of-fact diligence of the Parsee,[5] may have placed them respectively in their appreciation of the scientific marvels of the Polytechnic Institution, they meet on common ground in their admiration of the wax-work exhibition of Madame Tussaud; though the Khan, who was not sufficiently acquainted with the features of our public characters to judge of the likenesses, expresses his commendation only in general terms.  But the Parsees, with the naivete of children, break out into absolute raptures at recognising the features of Lord Melbourne, “a good-humoured looking, kind English gentleman, with a countenance, perhaps, representing frankness and candour more than dignity”—­William IV., “looking the very picture of good-nature”—­the Duke of Wellington, Lord Brougham, &c.; “indeed, we know of no exhibition (where a person has read about people) that will afford him so much pleasure, always recollecting that it is only one shilling, and for this you may stop just as long as you are inclined.”  Their remarks, on seeing the effigy of Voltaire, are too curious to be omitted.  “He is an extraordinary-looking man, dressed