legitimate cravings of the heart, Jesus had forgotten
the pleasure of living, of loving, of seeing, and
of feeling. Employing still more unmeasured language,
he even said, “If any man will come after me,
let him deny himself and follow me. He that loveth
father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me;
and he that loveth son or daughter more than me, is
not worthy of me. He that findeth his life shall
lose it, and he that loseth his life for my sake and
the gospel’s, shall find it. What is a
man profited if he shall gain the whole world, and
lose his own soul?"[3] Two anecdotes of the kind we
cannot accept as historical, but which, although they
were exaggerations, were intended to represent a characteristic
feature, clearly illustrate this defiance of nature.
He said to one man, “Follow me!”—But
he said, “Lord, suffer me first to go and bury
my father.” Jesus answered, “Let
the dead bury their dead: but go thou and preach
the kingdom of God.” Another said to him,
“Lord, I will follow thee; but let me first
go bid them farewell, which are at home at my house.”
Jesus replied, “No man, having put his hand to
the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom
of God."[4] An extraordinary confidence, and at times
accents of singular sweetness, reversing all our ideas
of him, caused these exaggerations to be easily received.
“Come unto me,” cried he, “all ye
that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you
rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me:
for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall
find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy,
and my burden is light."[5]
[Footnote 1: Luke xiv. 26. We must here
take into account the exaggeration of Luke’s
style.]
[Footnote 2: Luke xiv. 33.]
[Footnote 3: Matt. x. 37-39, xvi. 24, 25; Luke
ix. 23-25, xiv. 26, 27, xvii. 33; John xii. 25.]
[Footnote 4: Matt. viii. 21, 22; Luke ix. 59-62.]
[Footnote 5: Matt. xi. 28-30.]
A great danger threatened the future of this exalted
morality, thus expressed in hyperbolical language
and with a terrible energy. By detaching man
from earth the ties of life were severed. The
Christian would be praised for being a bad son, or
a bad patriot, if it was for Christ that he resisted
his father and fought against his country. The
ancient city, the parent republic, the state, or the
law common to all, were thus placed in hostility with
the kingdom of God. A fatal germ of theocracy
was introduced into the world.
From this point, another consequence may be perceived.
This morality, created for a temporary crisis, when
introduced into a peaceful country, and in the midst
of a society assured of its own duration, must seem
impossible. The Gospel was thus destined to become
a Utopia for Christians, which few would care to realize.
These terrible maxims would, for the greater number,
remain in profound oblivion, an oblivion encouraged
by the clergy itself; the Gospel man would prove a