[Footnote 2:  John iii. 1, and following, vii. 50.  We are certainly free to believe that the exact text of the conversation is but a creation of John’s.]

[Footnote 3:  John vii. 50, and following.]

[Footnote 4:  John xix. 39.]

As to the celebrated doctors of the time, Jesus does not appear to have had any connection with them.  Hillel and Shammai were dead; the greatest authority of the time was Gamaliel, grandson of Hillel.  He was of a liberal spirit, and a man of the world, not opposed to secular studies, and inclined to tolerance by his intercourse with good society.[1] Unlike the very strict Pharisees, who walked veiled or with closed eyes, he did not scruple to gaze even upon Pagan women.[2] This, as well as his knowledge of Greek, was tolerated because he had access to the court.[3] After the death of Jesus, he expressed very moderate views respecting the new sect.[4] St. Paul sat at his feet,[5] but it is not probable that Jesus ever entered his school.

[Footnote 1:  Mishnah, Baba Metsia, v. 8; Talm. of Bab., Sota, 49 b.]

[Footnote 2:  Talm. of Jerus., Berakoth, ix. 2.]

[Footnote 3:  Passage Sota, before cited, and Baba Kama, 83 a.]

[Footnote 4:  Acts v. 34, and following.]

[Footnote 5:  Acts xxii. 3.]

One idea, at least, which Jesus brought from Jerusalem, and which henceforth appears rooted in his mind, was that there was no union possible between him and the ancient Jewish religion.  The abolition of the sacrifices which had caused him so much disgust, the suppression of an impious and haughty priesthood, and, in a general sense, the abrogation of the law, appeared to him absolutely necessary.  From this time he appears no more as a Jewish reformer, but as a destroyer of Judaism.  Certain advocates of the Messianic ideas had already admitted that the Messiah would bring a new law, which should be common to all the earth.[1] The Essenes, who were scarcely Jews, also appear to have been indifferent to the temple and to the Mosaic observances.  But these were only isolated or unavowed instances of boldness.  Jesus was the first who dared to say that from his time, or rather from that of John,[2] the Law was abolished.  If sometimes he used more measured terms,[3] it was in order not to offend existing prejudices too violently.  When he was driven to extremities, he lifted the veil entirely, and declared that the Law had no longer any force.  On this subject he used striking comparisons.  “No man putteth a piece of new cloth into an old garment, neither do men put new wine into old bottles."[4] This was really his chief characteristic as teacher and creator.  The temple excluded all except Jews from its enclosure by scornful announcements.  Jesus had no sympathy with this.  The narrow, hard, and uncharitable Law was only made for the children of Abraham.  Jesus maintained that every well-disposed man, every