[Footnote 58: Among the Addresses sent in to the Drury Lane Committee was one by Dr. Busby, entitled a Monologue, of which the Parody was enclosed in this letter. A short specimen of this trifle will be sufficient. The four first lines of the Doctor’s Address are as follows:—
“When energising objects
men pursue,
What are the prodigies they
cannot do?
A magic Edifice you here survey,
Shot from the ruins of the
other day!”
Which verses are thus ridiculed, unnecessarily, in the Parody:—
“‘When energising
objects men pursue,’
The Lord knows what is writ
by Lord knows who.
‘A modest Monologue
you here survey,’
Hiss’d from the theatre
the ‘other day.’”
]
* * * * *
LETTER 114. TO MR. MURRAY.
“Oct. 19. 1812.
“Many thanks, but I must pay the damage, and will thank you to tell me the amount for the engraving. I think the ’Rejected Addresses’ by far the best thing of the kind since the Rolliad, and wish you had published them. Tell the author ’I forgive him, were he twenty times over a satirist;’ and think his imitations not at all inferior to the famous ones of Hawkins Browne. He must be a man of very lively wit, and less scurrilous than wits often are: altogether, I very much admire the performance, and wish it all success. The Satirist has taken a new tone, as you will see: we have now, I think, finished with Childe Harold’s critics. I have in hand a Satire on Waltzing, which you must publish anonymously: it is not long, not quite two hundred lines, but will make a very small boarded pamphlet. In a few days you shall have it.
“P.S.—The
editor of the Satirist ought to be thanked for
his
revocation; it is done
handsomely, after five years’ warfare.”
* * * * *
LETTER 115. TO MR. MURRAY.
“Oct. 23. 1812.
“Thanks, as usual. You go on boldly; but have a care of glutting the public, who have by this time had enough of Childe Harold. ‘Waltzing’ shall be prepared. It is rather above two hundred lines, with an introductory Letter to the Publisher. I think of publishing, with Childe Harold, the opening lines of the ’Curse of Minerva,’ as far as the first speech of Pallas,—because some of the readers like that part better than any I have ever written, and as it contains nothing to affect the subject of the subsequent portion, it will find a place as a Descriptive Fragment.
“The plate is broken? between ourselves, it was unlike the picture; and besides, upon the whole, the frontispiece of an author’s visage is but a paltry exhibition. At all events, this would have been no