and must be altered to—
“To break the master’s bread and salt.
This is not so well, though—confound it!”
[Footnote 75: This is written on a separate slip of paper enclosed.]
* * * * *
LETTER 132. TO MR. MURRAY.
“Oct. 12. 1813.
“You must look The Giaour again over carefully; there are a few lapses, particularly in the last page.—’I know ’twas false; she could not die;’ it was, and ought to be—’I knew.’ Pray observe this and similar mistakes.
“I have received and read the British Review. I really think the writer in most points very right. The only mortifying thing is the accusation of imitation. Crabbe’s passage I never saw[76]; and Scott I no further meant to follow than in his lyric measure, which is Gray’s, Milton’s, and any one’s who likes it. The Giaour is certainly a bad character, but not dangerous; and I think his fate and his feelings will meet with few proselytes. I shall be very glad to hear from or of you, when you please; but don’t put yourself out of your way on my account.”
[Footnote 76: The passage referred to by the Reviewers is in the poem entitled “Resentment;” and the following is, I take for granted, the part which Lord Byron is accused by them of having imitated:—
“Those are like wax—apply
them to the fire,
Melting, they take th’
impressions you desire;
Easy to mould, and fashion
as you please,
And again moulded with an
equal ease:
Like smelted iron these the
forms retain;
But, once impress’d,
will never melt again.”
]
* * * * *
LETTER 133. TO MR. MOORE.
“Bennet Street, August 22. 1813.
“As our late—I might say, deceased—correspondence had too much of the town-life leaven in it, we will now, ‘paulo majora,’ prattle a little of literature in all its branches; and first of the first—criticism. The Prince is at Brighton, and Jackson, the boxer, gone to Margate, having, I believe, decoyed Yarmouth to see a milling in that polite neighbourhood. Made. de Stael Holstein has lost one of her young barons, who has been carbonadoed by a vile Teutonic adjutant,—kilt and killed in a coffee-house at Scrawsenhawsen. Corinne is, of course, what all mothers must be,—but will, I venture to prophesy, do what few mothers could—write an Essay upon it. She cannot exist without a grievance—and somebody to see, or read, how much grief becomes her. I have not seen her since the event; but merely judge (not very charitably) from prior observation.
“In a ‘mail-coach copy’ of the Edinburgh, I perceive The Giaour is second article. The numbers are still in the Leith smack—pray,