beyond its proper bounds. Now the co-presence
of something regular, something to which the mind has
been accustomed in various moods and in a less excited
state, cannot but have great efficacy in tempering
and restraining the passion by an intertexture of
ordinary feeling, and of feeling not strictly and
necessarily connected with the passion. This is
unquestionably true; and hence, though the opinion
will at first appear paradoxical, from the tendency
of metre to divest language, in a certain degree, of
its reality, and thus to throw a sort of half-consciousness
of unsubstantial existence over the whole composition,
there can be little doubt but that more pathetic situations
and sentiments, that is, those which have a greater
proportion of pain connected with them, may be endured
in metrical composition, especially in rhyme, than
in prose. The metre of the old ballads is very
artless; yet they contain many passages which would
illustrate this opinion; and I hope, if the following
Poems be attentively perused, similar instances will
be found in them. This opinion may be further
illustrated by appealing to the Reader’s own
experience of the reluctance with which he comes to
the re-perusal of the distressful parts of
Clarissa
Harlowe, or the
Gamester; while Shakspeare’s
writings, in the most pathetic scenes, never act upon
us, as pathetic, beyond the bounds of pleasure—an
effect which, in a much greater degree than might
at first be imagined, is to be ascribed to small,
but continual and regular impulses of pleasurable surprise
from the metrical arrangement.—On the other
hand (what it must be allowed will much more frequently
happen) if the Poet’s words should be incommensurate
with the passion, and inadequate to raise the Reader
to a height of desirable excitement, then, (unless
the Poet’s choice of his metre has been grossly
injudicious) in the feelings of pleasure which the
Reader has been accustomed to connect with metre in
general, and in the feeling, whether cheerful or melancholy,
which he has been accustomed to connect with that
particular movement of metre, there will be found
something which will greatly contribute to impart passion
to the words, and to effect the complex end which
the Poet proposes to himself.
If I had undertaken a SYSTEMATIC defence of the theory
here maintained, it would have been my duty to develop
the various causes upon which the pleasure received
from metrical language depends. Among the chief
of these causes is to be reckoned a principle which
must be well known to those who have made any of the
Arts the object of accurate reflection; namely, the
pleasure which the mind derives from the perception
of similitude in dissimilitude. This principle
is the great spring of the activity of our minds,
and their chief feeder. From this principle the
direction of the sexual appetite, and all the passions
connected with it, take their origin: it is the
life of our ordinary conversation; and upon the accuracy