days, I shall arm the whole set, including myself, in case of accidents or treachery.  I used to play pretty well at the broad-sword, once upon a time, at Angelo’s; but I should like the pistol, our national buccaneer weapon, better, though I am out of practice at present.  However, I can ’wink and hold out mine iron.’  It makes me think (the whole thing does) of Romeo and Juliet—­’now, Gregory, remember thy swashing blow.’

“All these feuds, however, with the Cavalier for his wife, and the troopers for my liveries, are very tiresome to a quiet man, who does his best to please all the world, and longs for fellowship and good will.  Pray write.  I am yours,” &c.

* * * * *

LETTER 379.  TO MR. MOORE.

     “Ravenna, July 13. 1820.

“To remove or increase your Irish anxiety about my being ’in a wisp[77],’ I answer your letter forth-with; premising that, as I am a ‘Will of the wisp,’ I may chance to flit out of it.  But, first, a word on the Memoir;—­I have no objection, nay, I would rather that one correct copy was taken and deposited in honourable hands, in case of accidents happening to the original; for you know that I have none, and have never even re-read, nor, indeed, read at all what is there written; I only know that I wrote it with the fullest intention to be ‘faithful and true’ in my narrative, but not impartial—­no, by the Lord!  I can’t pretend to be that, while I feel.  But I wish to give every body concerned the opportunity to contradict or correct me.

“I have no objection to any proper person seeing what is there written,—­seeing it was written, like every thing else, for the purpose of being read, however much many writings may fail in arriving at that object.

“With regard to ‘the wisp,’ the Pope has pronounced their separation.  The decree came yesterday from Babylon,—­it was she and her friends who demanded it, on the grounds of her husband’s (the noble Count Cavalier’s) extraordinary usage. He opposed it with all his might because of the alimony, which has been assigned, with all her goods, chattels, carriage, &c. to be restored by him.  In Italy they can’t divorce.  He insisted on her giving me up, and he would forgive every thing,—­* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * But, in this country, the very courts hold such proofs in abhorrence, the Italians being as much more delicate in public than the English, as they are more passionate in private.

“The friends and relatives, who are numerous and powerful, reply to him—­’You, yourself, are either fool or knave,—­fool, if you did not see the consequences of the approximation