HUMAN LEVITATION.

Why is it that living fish add nothing to the “weight of the bucket of water in which they swim?” Charles II. is said to have asked the Royal Society.  A still more extraordinary question has been propounded in the grave pages of the Quarterly Journal of Science, edited by Mr. Crookes, a Fellow of the Royal Society, and the discoverer of the useful metal thallium.  The problem set in this learned review does not, like that of the Merry Monarch, beg the question of facts.  “What is the scientific inference from the various accounts, modern and traditional, of human levitation?” is the difficulty before the world at this present moment.  Now, there may be people who never heard of levitation, nor even of “thaums,” a term that frequently occurs in the article we refer to.  A slight acquaintance with the dead languages, whose shadows reappear in this queer fashion, enables the inquirer to decide that “levitation” means the power of becoming lighter than the surrounding atmosphere, and setting at nought the laws of gravitation.

Thaums, again, are wonders, and there is no very obvious reason why they should not be called wonders.  But to return to levitation.  Most of us have heard how Mr. Home and other gifted people possess the faculty of being raised from the ground, and of floating about the room, or even out of the window.  There are clouds of witnesses who have observed these phenomena, which generally occur in the dark.  In fact, they are part of that vague subject called spiritualism, about which opinion is so much divided, and views are so vague.  It has been said that the human race, in regard to this high argument, is divided into five classes.  There are people who believe; people who investigate; people who think the matter really ought to be looked into; people who dislike the topic, but who would believe in the phenomena if they were proved; and people of common sense, who would not believe in them if they were proved.  Now, the article in the Journal of Science only deals with one of the phenomena we hear so much of—­that of the sudden suspension of the laws of gravitation, in the case of individual men.  The author has collected a vast variety of traditions bearing on this subject, and his conclusion apparently is, that events of this kind, though rather rare, are natural, are peculiar to people of certain temperament and organization, and, above all, bring no proof as to the truth of the doctrines asserted by the persons who exhibit the phenomena.  Now, men of science, as a rule, and the world at large, look on stories of this sort as myths, romances, false interpretations of subjective feelings, pious frauds, and absurd nonsense.  Before expressing an opinion, it may be well to look over the facts, as they are called, which are brought under our notice.