To exclude matter from our conception (if it were possible) would be to think universal existence out of existence, which is tantamount to thinking without anything to think about.  The ideas of those who try their brains at this odd sort of work, have been well likened to an atmosphere of dust superintended by a whirlwind.  They who assume the existence of an unsubstantial i.e. immaterial First Cause, outrage every admitted rule and every sound principle of philosophising.  Only pious persons with ideas like unto an atmosphere of dust superintended by a whirl wind would write books in vindication of the monstrously absurd assumption that there exists an unsubstantial Great First Cause of all substantialities.  Nothing can be wilder than the speculations of such ‘hair brained’ individuals, excepting only the speculations of those sharp-sighted enough to see reason and wisdom in them.

A Great Cause, or a Small Cause, a First Cause, or a Last Cause, involves the idea of real existence, namely, the existence of matter.  By cause of itself, said Spinoza, I understand that which involves existence, or that the nature of which can only be considered as existent.  And who does not so understand Cause?  Why Gillespie and other eminently dogmatic Christian writers whose Great First Cause cannot be considered an entity, because they assert, yes, expressly assert its immateriality.

If Nature is all, and all is Nature, nothing but itself could ever have existed, and of course nothing but itself can be supposed ever to have been capable of causing.  To cause is to act, and though body without action is conceivable, action without body is not.  Neither can two Infinites be supposed to tenant one Universe.  Only ’most religious philosophers’ can pretend to acknowledge the being of an infinite God co-existent with an infinite universe.

Atheists are frequently asked—­What moves matter? to which question, nothing is the true and sufficient answer.  Matter moves matter.  If asked how we know it does, our answer is, because we see it do so, which is more than mind imaginers can say of their ‘prime mover.’  They tell us mind moves matter; but none save the second sighted among them ever saw mind; and if they never saw mind, they never could have seen matter pushed about by it.  They babble about mind, but nowhere does mind exist save in their mind; that is to say, nowhere but nowhere.  Ask these broad-day dreamers where mind is, minus body? and very acutely they answer, body is the mind and mind is the body.

That this is neither joke nor slander, we will show by reference to No. 25 of ‘The Shepherd,’ a clever and well known periodical, whose editor, [44:1] in reply to a correspondent of the ‘chaotic’ tribe, said ’As to the question—­where is magnetism without the magnet?  We answer, magnetism is the magnet, and the magnet is magnetism.’  If so, body is the mind and the mind is body; and our Shepherd, if asked, ‘Where is mind without the body?’ to be consistent, should answer, body is the mind and the mind is the body.  Both these answers are true or both are false; and it must be allowed—­