Politicians have such a narrow way of looking at things.  The other side can do nothing right while they themselves are absolutely faultless!  If a Tory wishes to confer an opprobrious epithet on a person he calls him a Radical, and vice versa; the opposite faction is capable of any enormity?  This reminds me of the old Scotchman who on being asked his opinion of a man who had first murdered and then mutilated his victim, answered in a shocked voice, “What do I think?  Well, I think that a maun who’d do all that would whistle on the Sawbuths!” “Such a man must be a Home Ruler,” my father would have said.

In having a guest with opposite views at your dinner table, what agonies do you not suffer?  I have gone through those dreadful meals trembling at every word that drops from the man’s lips.  Try as you may, turn the conversation how you will, there is sure to be some allusion, some statement that sets on fire all the host’s enthusiasm, and it does not take long before the poor guest is entirely annihilated and subdued—­unless indeed he is as hot on his side as the other is on his; then indeed all we can do is to sit and hear it out.  To attempt to stem such a torrent would be the act of a lunatic.  We only feel thankful that “pistols for two and coffee for one” is a thing of the past.

The General Elections are dreadful times; nothing but canvassing goes on night after night for weeks beforehand.  Conversation is entirely restricted to the coming event—­if you mention a word about anything apart from it, you are considered absolutely profane, and are treated as a pariah for the next few days.

It is interesting, I admit, and the election day itself is positively exciting.  You cannot help catching the malady at times.  I remember once, when I was very little, and walking out with my governess, tearing down a Liberal bill, in spite of all she said to the contrary.  True, it was on what she considered her own side, though I don’t think she knew enough to distinguish between the two; still her real annoyance was occasioned more by the look of the thing.  That a pupil of hers should act in such a plebeian way, and in so public a place, certainly must have been somewhat provoking?  Anyhow, she gave me a bad mark for disobedience, which affected me but little, as when I related the story to my father later on he rewarded me with a shilling for my prowess!  Electioneering, you see, is not good for the morals!

How tired you get, too, of seeing the names of would-be members stuck up all over the place.  My brothers used to follow the Liberal bill-sticker round, and as soon as he had turned his back pull the placards down, or cover them up with their own.  This was found out at last, and the foe grew more cautious.

Then the extravagant promises made by the candidates, which they never really intend to fulfil, and could not if they wished.  It is like the man in Church who, while singing—­