but it’s so unnatural, that an ingenious Person may find much more pleasure in reading a worse Poet.  Besides, his Stanza’s often cramp the Sence, and injure many a noble Thought and Passion.  But Mr. Cowley’s Davideis is the Medium between both; it has Gondibert’s Majesty without his stiffness, and something of Spencer’s Sweetness and Variety, without his Irregularity:  Indeed all his Works are so admirable, that another Cowley might well be employ’d in giving them their just Elogy.  His Hero is according to the ancient Model, truly Poetical, a mixture of some Faults and greater Virtues.  He had the advantage of both Love and Honour for his Episodes, nay, and Friendship too, and that the noblest in History.  He had all the sacred History before him, and liberty to chuse where he pleased, either by Narration or Prophecy; nor has he, as far as he has gone, neglected any advantage the Subject gave him.  Its a great Loss to the World that he left the Work unfinish’d, since now he’s dead, its always like to continue so.  As for Milton’s Paradise Lost its an Original, and indeed he seems rather above the common Rules of Epic than ignorant of them.  Its I’m sure a very lovely Poem, by what ever Name it’s call’d, and in it he has many Thoughts and Images, greater than perhaps any either in Virgil or Homer.  The Foundation is true History, but the turn is Fable:  The Action is very Important, but not uniform; for one can’t tell which is the Principal in the Poem, the Wars of the Angels or the Fall of Man, nor which is the Chief Person Michael or Adam.  Its true, the former comes in as an Episode to the latter, but it takes up too great a part thereof, because its link’d to it.  His Discourse of Light is incomparable; and I think ’twas worth the while to be blind to be its Author.  His Description of Adam and Eve, their Persons and Love, is almost too lively to bear reading:  Not but that he has his inequalities and repetitions, the latter pretty often, as have, more or less, all other Poets but Virgil.  For his antique Words I’m not like to blame him whoever does:  And for his blank Verse, I’m of a different mind from most others, and think they rather excuse his uncorrectness than the contraries; for I find its easier to run into it, in that sort of Verse, than in Rhyming Works where the Thought is oftner turned; whereas here the Fancy flows on, without check or controul.  As for his Paradise Regain’d, I nothing wonder that it has not near the Life of his former Poem, any more than the Odysses fell short of the Iliads.  Milton, when he writ this, was grown Older, probably poorer:  He had not that scope for Fable, was confin’d to a lower Walk, and draws out that in four Books which might have been well compriz’d in one:  Notwithstanding all this, there are many strokes which appear truly his; as the Mustring of the Parthian Troops, the Description of Rome by the Devil to our Saviour, and several other places.

And now I’ve done with all the rest, I may take liberty to say something of my own.