moreover they could hold three or four bishoprics apiece
together with other places of emolument, whereas they
now can only have one apiece. The second cause
is that the number of the Cardinals has been increased
to seventy-five, and that the foreign powers have ceased
to compliment them with large presents and Benefices,
as was the wont of Charles V. and the French crown.’
In the last of these clauses we find clearly indicated
one of the main results of the concordat established
between the Papacy and the Catholic sovereigns by
the policy of Pius IV. It secured Papal absolutism
at the expense of the college. Soranzo proceeds
to describe the changes visible in Roman society.
’The train of life at Court is therefore mean,
partly through poverty, but also owing to the good
example of Cardinal Borromeo, seeing that people are
wont to follow the manners of their princes.
The Cardinal holds in his hands all the threads of
the administration; and living religiously in the retirement
I have noticed, indulging in liberalities to none but
persons of his own stamp, there is neither Cardinal
nor courtier who can expect any favor from him unless
he conform in fact or in appearance to his mode of
life. Consequently one observes that they have
altogether withdrawn, in public at any rate, from
every sort of pleasures. One sees no longer Cardinals
in masquerade or on horseback, nor driving with women
about Rome for pastime, as the custom was of late;
but the utmost they do is to go alone in close coaches.
Banquets, diversions, hunting parties, splendid liveries
and all the other signs of outward luxury have been
abolished; the more so that now there is at Court no
layman of high quality, as formerly when the Pope
had many of his relatives or dependents around him.
The clergy always wear their robes, so that the reform
of the Church is manifested in their appearance.
This state of things, on the other hand, has been
the ruin of the artisans and merchants, since no money
circulates. And while all offices and magistracies
are in the hands of Milanese, grasping and illiberal
persons, very few indeed can be still called satisfied
with the present reign.’[60]
[Footnote 59: Giac. Soranzo, op. cit. pp. 131-136]
[Footnote 60: Soranzo, op. cit. pp. 136-138.]
One chief defect of Pius IV., judged by the standard of the new party in the Church, had been his coldness in religious exercises. Paolo Tiepolo remarks that during the last seven months of his life he never once attended service in his chapel.[61]
[Footnote 61: Op. cit. p. 171.]