that they took refuge in the palace of the Papal Nuncio,
whence they escaped that same evening to the Lido
en route for the States of the Church.
An old Venetian nobleman of the highest birth, Alessandro
Malipiero, who bore a singular affection for the champion
of his country’s liberty, was walking a short
way in front of Sarpi beyond the bridge upon which
the assault was perpetrated. He rushed to his
friend’s aid, dragged out the dagger from his
face, and bore him to the convent. There Sarpi
lay for many weeks in danger, suffering as much, it
seems, from his physicians as from the wounds.
Not satisfied with the attendance of his own surgeon,
Alvise Ragoza, the Venetians insisted on sending all
the eminent doctors of the city and of Padua to his
bedside. The illustrious Acquapendente formed
one of this miscellaneous cortege; and when
the cure was completed, he received a rich gold chain
and knighthood for his service. Every medical
man suggested some fresh application. Some of
them, suspecting poison, treated the wounds with theriac
and antidotes. Others cut into the flesh and
probed. Meanwhile the loss of blood had so exhausted
Sarpi’s meager frame that for more than twenty
days he had no strength to move or lift his hands.
Not a word of impatience escaped his lips; and when
Acquapendente began to medicate the worst wound in
his face, he moved the dozen doctors to laughter by
wittily observing, ’And yet the world maintains
that it was given Stilo Romanae Curiae.’[145]
His old friend Malipiero would fain have kept the dagger
as a relic. But Sarpi suspended it at the foot
of a crucifix in the church of the Servi, with this
appropriate inscription, Dei Filio Liberatori.
When he had recovered from his long suffering, the
Republic assigned their Counselor an increase of pension
in order that he might maintain a body of armed guards,
and voted him a house in S. Marco for the greater security
of his person. But Sarpi begged to be allowed
to remain among the friars, with whom he had spent
his life, and where his vocation bound him. In
the future he took a few obvious precautions, passing
in a gondola to the Rialto and thence on foot through
the crowded Merceria to the Ducal Palace, and furthermore
securing the good offices of his attendants in the
convent by liberal gifts of money. Otherwise,
he refused to alter the customary tenor of his way.
[Footnote 144: Dispatch to Fr. Contarini under date September 25, 1607, quoted in Campbell’s Life of Sarpi, p. 145.]
[Footnote 145: Fulgenzio’s Life, p. 61. A.G. Campbell asserts that this celebrated mot of Sarpi’s is not to be found in Fulgenzio’s MS. It occurs, however, quite naturally in the published work. The first edition of the Life appeared in 1646, eight years before Fulgenzio’s death. The discrepancies between it and the MS. may therefore have been intended by the author.]