the year which followed his return to Ferrara in 1576.
But they reached their climax in the spring of 1577.
He had lost his prestige, and every servant might
insult him, and every cur snap at his heels.
Even the
Gerusalemme, became an object of derision.
It transpired that the revisers, to whom he had confided
it, were picking the poem to pieces; ignoramuses who
could not scan a line, went about parroting their
pedantries and strictures. At the beginning of
1576 Tasso had begged Alfonso to give him the post
of historiographer left vacant by Pigna. It was
his secret hope that this would be refused, and that
so he would obtain a good excuse for leaving Ferrara.[27]
But the duke granted his request. In the autumn
of that year, one of the band of his tormentors, Maddalo
de’Frecci, betrayed some details of his love-affairs.
What these were we do not know. Tasso resented
the insult, and gave the traitor a box on the ears
in the courtyard of the castle. Maddalo and his
brothers, after this, attacked Tasso on the piazza,
but ran away before they reached him with their swords.
They were outlawed for the outrage, and the duke of
Ferrara, still benignant to his poet, sent him a kind
message by one of his servants. This incident
weighed on Tasso’s memory. The terror of
the Inquisition blended now with two new terrors.
He conceived that his exiled foes were plotting to
poison him. He wondered whether Maddalo’s
revelations had reached the duke’s ears, and
if so, whether Alfonso would not inflict sudden vengeance.
There is no sufficient reason, however, to surmise
that Tasso’s conscience was really burdened
with a guilty secret touching Leonora d’Este.
On the contrary, everything points to a different
conclusion. His mind was simply giving way.
Just as he conjured up the ghastly specter of the
Inquisition, so he fancied that the duke would murder
him. Both the Inquisition and the duke were formidable;
but the Holy Office mildly told him to set his morbid
doubts at rest, and the duke on a subsequent occasion
coldly wrote: ’I know he thinks I want to
kill him. But if indeed I did so, it would be
easy enough.’ The duke, in fact, had no
sufficient reason and no inclination to tread upon
this insect.
[Footnote 27: Lettere, vol. i. p. 139.]
In June 1577, the crisis came. On the seventeenth
evening of the month Tasso was in the apartments of
the Duchess of Urbino. He had just been declaiming
on the subject of his imaginary difficulties with the
Inquisition, when something in the manner of a servant
who passed by aroused his suspicion. He drew
a knife upon the man—like Hamlet in his
mother’s bedchamber. He was immediately
put under arrest, and confined in a room of the castle.
Next day Maffeo Veniero wrote thus to the Grand Duke
of Tuscany about the incident. ’Yesterday
Tasso was imprisoned for having drawn a knife upon
a servant in the apartment of the Duchess of Urbino.
The intention has been to stay disorder and to cure
him, rather than to inflict punishment. He suffers
under peculiar delusions, believing himself guilty
of heresy and dreading poison; which state of mind
arises, I incline to think, from melancholic blood
forced in upon the heart and vaporing to the brain.
A wretched case, in truth, considering his great parts
and his goodness!’[28]