We acted in perfect good faith with the Government, believing it to be their desire, as it was ours, to avert bloodshed, and believing it to be their intention to give us the redress which was implied in the ‘earnest consideration of grievances.’

There can be no better evidence of our earnest endeavour to repair what we regarded as a mistake on the part of Dr. Jameson than the following offer which our deputation, authorized by resolution of the Committee, laid before the Government Commission: 

’If the Government will permit Dr. Jameson to come into Johannesburg unmolested, the Committee will guarantee, with their persons if necessary, that he will leave again peacefully as soon as possible.’

We faithfully carried out the agreement that we should commit no act of hostility against the Government; we ceased all active operations for the defence of the town against any attack, and we did everything in our power to prevent any collision with the burghers—­an attempt in which our efforts were happily successful.

On the telegraphic advice of the result of the interview of the deputation with the Government Commission, we despatched Mr. Lace, a member of our Committee, as an escort to the courier carrying the High Commissioner’s despatch to Dr. Jameson, in order to assure ourselves that the despatch would reach its destination.

On the following Saturday, January 4, the High Commissioner arrived in Pretoria.  On Monday, the sixth, the following telegram was sent to us: 

  ’Pretoria, January 6, 1896.

’From H.M.’s AGENT to REFORM COMMITTEE, Johannesburg.

’January 6.—­I am directed to inform you that the High Commissioner met the President, the Executive, and the Judges to-day.  The President announced the decision of the Government to be that Johannesburg must lay down its arms unconditionally as a [condition] precedent to a discussion and consideration of grievances.  The High Commissioner endeavoured to obtain some indication of the steps which would be taken in the event of disarmament, but without success, it being intimated that the Government had nothing more to say on this subject than had already been embodied in the President’s proclamation.  The High Commissioner inquired whether any decision had been come to as regards the disposal of the prisoners, and received a reply in the negative.  The President said that as his burghers, to the number of 8,000, had been collected and could not be asked to remain indefinitely, he must request a reply “Yes” or “No” to this ultimatum within twenty-four hours.’

On the following day Sir Jacobus de Wet, H.M.’s Agent, met us in committee, and handed to us the following wire from his Excellency the High Commissioner: 

’HIGH COMMISSIONER, Pretoria, to SIR J. DE WET, Johannesburg.

’Received Johannesburg 7.36 a.m., January 7, 1896.