to himself in her garden, and to dedicate it to the Duke of Normandy; and, what was a very much graver matter, that he had visited Lyons with the express purpose of stirring up a revolution there.  In some of his letters, also, he mentioned this attempted up-rising in the great city which rests on the twin rivers, and asserted that the denouement approached, and that his triumph was certain.  “I am at Lyons,” he added, “where I have seen the representatives of sixty-five departments.  We shall march to Paris, and I have in the capital forces ten times greater than are necessary to oust the rascal!”

To follow all the evidence which was led against the prisoner would be very tedious, and worse than useless; but one witness appeared whose testimony is worthy of record.  He was an old man, aged seventy-six, who was very deaf, and whose voice was almost gone.  It was Lasne, the faithful keeper of the Temple.  He said—­

“Two people came to my house and asked me if the dauphin were really dead, and if he had not been carried out of the Temple; and I told them that the poor child died in my arms, and that though a thousand years were to pass his Majesty Louis XVII. would never re-appear.”

Then the interrogatory proceeded:—­

“Was he long ill?”

“He was ill for nine months after the establishment of the commune.  Dr. Dessault prescribed several drops of a mixture which he was to take every morning, and three consecutive times the child vomited the medicine, and asked if it were not injurious.  In order to reassure him, Dr. Dessault took the cup and drank some of it before him, when he said, ’Very good.  You have said that I ought to take this liquid, and I will take it;’ and he swallowed it.  Dr. Dessault attended him for eight days, and every morning drank some of the medicine to reassure the Child.  When Dessault died suddenly from an apoplectic stroke, M. Pellatan took his place and continued the same treatment.  At the end of three months the poor child died resting on my left arm.”

“Was it easy to approach the child?”

“No, sir; it was necessary to pass through the courts of the Temple.  The applicant then knocked at a wicket.  I answered the summons; and if I recognised the person I opened the wicket.  Then the visitor was taken to the third floor, where the prince was.”

“Did he show much intelligence?”

“Yes, sir, he was very intelligent.  Every day I walked with him on the top of the Tower, holding him under the arm.  He had a tumour at his knee, which gave him a great deal of pain.”

“But it is said that another child was substituted for him, and that the real dauphin was smuggled out of the Tower?”

“That is a false idea.  I used to be a captain of the French Gardes in the old days, and in that capacity I often saw the young dauphin.  I have attended him in the Jardin des Feuillants, and I am convinced that the child who was under my care was the same.  I was condemned to death; but the events of the 9th Thermidor saved my life.  I was condemned, at the instigation of Saint-Just, who caused me to be arrested by eight gens d’armes.  I solemnly declare that the child who died in my arms was in reality Louis XVII.”