imagine the public, for one night, were much aggrieved by the omission of the usual clap-trap performance (part of Garrick’s interpolation, which indeed belongs to the original story, but which Shakespeare’s true poet’s sense had discarded) of Romeo’s plucking Juliet up from her bier and rushing with her, still stiff and motionless in her death-trance, down to the foot-lights.  This feat Miss Tree insisted upon attempting with me, and I as stoutly resisted all her entreaties to let her do so.  I was a very slender-looking girl, but very heavy for all that. (A friend of mine, on my first voyage to America, lifting me from a small height, set me down upon the deck, exclaiming, “Oh, you solid little lady!” and my cousin, John Mason, the first time he acted Romeo with me, though a very powerful, muscular young man, whispered to me as he carried my corpse down the stage with a fine semblance of frenzy, “Jove, Fanny, you are a lift!”) Finding that all argument and remonstrance was unavailing, and that Miss Tree, though by no means other than a good friend and fellow-worker of mine, was bent upon performing this gymnastic feat, I said at last, “If you attempt to lift or carry me down the stage, I will kick and scream till you set me down,” which ended the controversy.  I do not know whether she believed me, but she did not venture upon the experiment.

I am reminded by this recollection of my pleasant professional fellowship with Miss Ellen Tree of a curious instance of the unprincipled, flagrant recklessness with which scandalous gossip is received and circulated in what calls itself the best English society.

In Mr. Charles Greville’s “Memoirs,” he makes a statement that Miss Tree was never engaged at Covent Garden.  The play-bills and the newspapers of the day abundantly contradicted this assertion (at the time he entered it in his diary), and, of course, the discreditable motive assigned for the fact.

I cannot help thinking that, had Mr. Greville lived, much of the voluminous record he kept of persons and events would have been withheld from publication.  He told me, not long before his death, that he had no recollection whatever of the contents of the earlier volumes of his MS. journal which he had lent me to read; and it is infinitely to be regretted, if he did not look over them before they were published, that the discretion he exercised (or delegated) in the omission of certain passages was not allowed to prevail to the exclusion of others.  Such partial omissions would not indeed alter the whole tone and character of the book, but might have mitigated the shock of painful surprise with which it was received by the society he described, and by no one more than some of those who had been on terms of the friendliest intimacy with him and who had repeatedly heard him assert that his journal would never be published in the lifetime of any one mentioned in it.