rushes about the stage he should lose his balance and
fall; as indeed he once did, to my unspeakable distress,
in the play of “The Grecian Daughter,”
in which he enacted my husband, Phocion, and flying
to embrace me, after a period of painful and eventful
separation, he completely overbalanced himself, and
swinging round with me in his arms, we both came to
the ground together. “Oh, Mr. Abbot!”
was all I could ejaculate; he, poor man, literally
pale green with dismay, picked me up in profound silence,
and the audience kindly covered our confusion, and
comforted us by vehement applause, not, indeed, unmixed
with laughter. But my friends and admirers were
none the more his after that exploit; and I remained
in mortal dread of his stage embraces for ever after,
steadying myself carefully on my feet, and bracing
my whole figure to “stand fast,” whenever
he made the smallest affectionate approach toward
me. It is not often that such a piece of awkwardness
as this is perpetrated on the stage, but dramatic
heroines are nevertheless liable to sundry disagreeable
difficulties of a very unromantic nature. If a
gentleman in a ball-room places his hand round a lady’s
waist to waltz with her, she can, without any shock
to the “situation,” beg him to release
the end spray of her flowery garland, or the floating
ribbons of her head-dress, which he may have imprisoned;
but in the middle of a scene of tragedy grief or horror,
of the unreality of which, by dint of the effort of
your imagination, you are no longer conscious, to be
obliged to say, in your distraction, to your distracted
partner in woe, “Please lift your arm from my
waist, you are pulling my head down backwards,”
is a distraction, too, of its kind.
The only occasion on which I ever acted Juliet to
a Romeo who looked the part was one when Miss Ellen
Tree sustained it. The acting of Romeo, or any
other man’s part by a woman (in spite of Mrs.
Siddons’s Hamlet), is, in my judgment, contrary
to every artistic and perhaps natural propriety, but
I cannot deny that the stature “more than common
tall,” and the beautiful face, of which the
fine features were too marked in their classical regularity
to look feeble or even effeminate, of my fair female
lover made her physically an appropriate representative
of Romeo. Miss Ellen Tree looked beautiful and
not unmanly in the part; she was broad-shouldered
as well as tall, and her long limbs had the fine proportions
of the huntress Diana; altogether, she made a very
“pretty fellow,” as the saying was formerly,
as all who saw her in her graceful performance of
Talfourd’s “Ion” will testify; but
assumption of that character, which in its ideal classical
purity is almost without sex, was less open to objection
than that of the fighting young Veronese noble of
the fourteenth century. She fenced very well,
however, and acquitted herself quite manfully in her
duel with Tybalt; the only hitch in the usual “business”
of the part was between herself and me, and I do not