The strength of the army in the field varied considerably, on account of causes which are described elsewhere, and there is no doubt that it frequently fell below twenty thousand men while the Boers were still on their enemy’s territory. The following table, prepared with great care and with the assistance of the leading Boer commanders, gives as correct an idea of the burghers’ numerical strength actually in the field at various stages of the campaign as will probably ever be formulated:—
-----------------+----------+------------+------------+
------- Date. | Natal. | Free State | Transvaal | Total. | | and Border.| and Border.| -----------------+----------+------------+------------+-----
-- November 1, 1899 | 12,000 | 12,000 | 5,000 | 29,000 December 1, 1899 | 13,000 | 12,000 | 5,000 | 30,000 January 1, 1900 | 13,000 | 12,000 | 3,000 | 28,000 February 1, 1900 | 12,000 | 10,000 | 3,000 | 25,000 March 1, 1900 | 8,000 | 8,000 | 7,000 | 23,000 April 1, 1900 | 5,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 25,000 May 1, 1900 | 4,500 | 9,000 | 9,000 | 22,500 June 1, 1900 | | 4,500 | 16,000 | 20,500 July 1, 1900 | | 4,000 | 15,000 | 19,000 -----------------+----------+------------+------------+-----
--
According to this table, the average strength of the Boer forces during the nine months was considerably less than 25,000 men. In refutation of these figures it may be found after the conclusion of hostilities that a far greater number of men surrendered their guns to the British army, but it must be remembered that not every Boer who owned a weapon was continually in the field.
THE GRESHAM PRESS
UNWIN BROTHERS,
WOKING AND LONDON.