limited in their power of counting. They have
ubatulda, 1, and
ikporda, 2; but they
can go no further, except in a manner similar to that
of the Veddas. Above two they proceed wholly
by means of the fingers, saying as they tap the nose
with each successive finger,
anka, “and
this.” Only the more intelligent of the
Andamans can count at all, many of them seeming to
be as nearly destitute of the number sense as it is
possible for a human being to be. The Bushmen[43]
of South Africa have but two numerals, the pronunciation
of which can hardly be indicated without other resources
than those of the English alphabet. Their word
for 3 means, simply, many, as in the case of some
of the Australian tribes. The Watchandies[44]
have but two simple numerals, and their entire number
system is
cooteon, 1,
utaura, 2,
utarra
cooteoo, 3,
atarra utarra, 4. Beyond
this they can only say,
booltha, many, and
booltha bat, very many. Although they have
the expressions here given for 3 and 4, they are reluctant
to use them, and only do so when absolutely required.
The natives of Lower California[45] cannot count above
5. A few of the more intelligent among them understand
the meaning of 2 fives, but this number seems entirely
beyond the comprehension of the ordinary native.
The Comanches, curiously enough, are so reluctant
to employ their number words that they appear to prefer
finger pantomime instead, thus giving rise to the
impression which at one time became current, that
they had no numerals at all for ordinary counting.
Aside from the specific examples already given, a
considerable number of sweeping generalizations may
be made, tending to show how rudimentary the number
sense may be in aboriginal life. Scores of the
native dialects of Australia and South America have
been found containing number systems but little more
extensive than those alluded to above. The negro
tribes of Africa give the same testimony, as do many
of the native races of Central America, Mexico, and
the Pacific coast of the United States and Canada,
the northern part of Siberia, Greenland, Labrador,
and the arctic archipelago. In speaking of the
Eskimos of Point Barrow, Murdoch[46] says: “It
was not easy to obtain any accurate information about
the numeral system of these people, since in ordinary
conversation they are not in the habit of specifying
any numbers above five.” Counting is often
carried higher than this among certain of these northern
tribes, but, save for occasional examples, it is limited
at best. Dr. Franz Boas, who has travelled extensively
among the Eskimos, and whose observations are always
of the most accurate nature, once told the author
that he never met an Eskimo who could count above
15. Their numerals actually do extend much higher;
and a stray numeral of Danish origin is now and then
met with, showing that the more intelligent among
them are able to comprehend numbers of much greater