formed by lower animals, and are equally the products
of natural evolution. This whole subject seems
to be exceedingly complex, because in our daily contact
with others of our kind and in our occasional views
of foreign races like our own, the smaller details
occupy our attention, diverting it from the great
basic principles according to which every society
is organized and operates. But when once the major
elements have been discovered in civilized and more
primitive nations, the secondary and less essential
phenomena fall into their proper relations, and a
statement of the whole process of development becomes
relatively simple. So much space has been devoted
to lower types of communal organisms in order to learn
what the fundamentals are, and not merely to provide
analogies that may be useful hereafter. It now
remains to arrange the evidences of social progress
during the history of mankind itself, and to bring
such human facts into relation with what has been discovered
in lower nature. It is helpful to begin this
part of the subject by asking ourselves what is already
part of common knowledge about human history.
Do we know of any civilized nation that is absolutely
stable and unvarying in social structure, or one that
has remained unchanged throughout historic time?
The answer must be negative, for in no case does the
past disclose an example of permanence in social or
in any other respect; monarchies and republics are
plastic like the human frame itself. The American
Commonwealth is a relatively young social organism,
and it is an easy task to trace its growth from beginnings
in the diffuse and uncorrelated colonies of pre-Revolutionary
years. Those colonies that were formed by English
settlers were transplanted outgrowths from a civilized
social parent which in its turn had clearly evolved
from the state of King John’s time and the still
cruder form it had under King Alfred.
Should we follow back the recorded history of any
people now civilized, we would always find evidence
of ceaseless change; and the writings of ancient historians
like Herodotus and Caesar and Tacitus give a great
deal of information about the barbarous conditions
from which civilization evolved.
But much more is known that materially amplifies the
account of human progress based upon documents alone.
The student of existing human races early learns that
social structure is a very varied thing. The natives
of northern Africa now live in a semi-civilized state
which is very like that of medieval England.
In Siberia and the American Southwest are tribes that
correspond socially with the barbarians of Europe described
by Greek and Roman writers. The American Indians
discovered by the earliest colonists, the Polynesians
of a century ago, and the Fuegians of recent decades
provide counterparts of the ancient stone-wielding
people who were the savage ancestors of European barbarians.
Hence the comparative study and classification of
modern races establishes a scale of social grades which