did know that all these scandalous rumours had been
flying about for years, that the “entertainment”
was not ordinary opera, that the opening of Bayreuth
was to mark the beginning of a millennium—a
new moral, religious, political and goodness knows
what sort of era. Bayreuth from the first had
attracted a very disagreeable set of persons, men
whom fathers would not allow to speak to their daughters—or
to their sons. Wagner himself had invited ridicule
by claiming that his theatre was not to be a mere
opera-house, but, as he told Sir Charles Halle, the
centre of the intellectual and artistic world.
“A noble ambition!” scornfully replied
the pianist. In a word, nothing was done to conciliate;
everything was done to create resentment and opposition.
King Ludwig’s unpopularity must not be forgotten.
Not Bavarians only, but all the German-speaking peoples,
knew Bavarian national finances to be in a deplorable,
desperate condition, and it seemed to them scandalous
that State funds should be used—as, rightly
or wrongly, was thought—for Ludwig’s
own gross, unspeakable pleasures. While the Germans
were thus alienated, Wagner immediately after 1871
had stirred up the wrath of the French by speaking
of the German army as the “world-conquerors”;
he had angered the English musicians by the many remarks
concerning them uttered by or attributed to him after
his exploits with the Philharmonic society. He
had written against the Jews, and though their finest
musicians were with him, the bulk were against him.
That the performances were in many respects admirable,
indeed without any precedent, we are bound to believe.
The artists, great and little, had toiled for months
to attain perfection. Most of the orchestra,
headed by Wilhelmj, had slaved without payment that
there might be no deficiencies in their department.
The stage machinery, crude though it seems to us nowadays
when we read of it, was on all sides reckoned marvellous.
Interminable rehearsals had been held, Wagner supervising
them all. In the end, even the anti-Wagnerites
who went to curse, admitted that unheard-of results
had been achieved: they would not give in about
the music, which remained, in their crass ears, “without
form or melody”; and we may therefore the more
readily accept their testimony as to Wagner’s
supremacy as a musical director. The late Mr.
Joseph Bennett’s reports—and he was
till his last breath a violent anti-Wagnerite—are
typical: they may be read in the files of the
Daily Telegraph, and are well worth reading.
But, alas! when those heartless people called accountants
came to add up their mysterious sums and to put figures
on the credit side and on the debit side, they proved
incontestably that an appalling deficit was the most
obvious result of the whole proceedings; and if Wagner
had any doubts, the steady inflowing tide of bills
to be met must have finally convinced him. To
pay the deficit, dresses and scenery had to be sold;
and for a time, at any rate, it was clear the theatre