little of the faith in Him produced by its display; but there can be no question of His extraordinary control of physical forces for the aims of His Kingdom.  It was, however, in the moral conflict between the Divine Order and things as they were, that He saw the decisive collision, and faced it with heroic faith in His Father’s victory.  When the dominant authorities in Church and State were about to crush Him, He looked forward undismayed, and in the glowing pictures of fervent Jewish men of hope He imaged the Divine Rule He proclaimed coming in power.

He was to His followers the Conqueror of sin.  He went forth to wage war with evil in the world, because He was conscious that He had first bound the strong man, and could spoil his house.  In an autobiographical parable He seems to have told them something of His own battle with temptation and of His victory.  They found in Him One who both shamed and transformed them; they saw Him forgiving and altering sinners; and, above all, His cross, from the earliest days when they began to ask themselves what it meant, had for them redemptive force.

He was to them the Victor of death.  However the historian may deal with the details of the narratives of the appearances of the risen Jesus to His disciples, he cannot fail to recognize the conviction of Jesus’ followers that their Lord had returned to them and was alive with power.  We must remember that it was to faith alone that the risen Jesus showed Himself, and that no one outside the circle of believers (unless we except Saul of Tarsus) saw Him after His death.  Historical research, independent of Christian faith, may not be able positively to affirm the correctness of the Easter faith of the disciples, for the data lie, in part at least, outside the range of such research.  But the historian must leave the door open for faith; and he may go further and point out that faith’s explanation best fits the facts.  Present faith finds itself prepared to receive the witness of the men of faith centuries ago.  The attempt to banish Jesus from our world signally failed; He was a more living and potent force in it after, than before, His death.

This singular religious experience, character and victory we ascribe to the Jesus of history through the tradition which preserves for us His religious impression upon His immediate followers.  There are some who lay little stress upon the events of the past; like Shelley’s Skylark, they are “scorners of the ground.”  Why, they ask, should we care what took place in Palestine centuries ago?  The answer is that it is the roots which go down into historic fact which give the whole tree of Christian faith its stability and vigor.  A tree gathers nourishment and grows by its leaves; and Christianity has undoubtedly taken into itself many enriching elements from the life about it in every age; but a tree without roots is neither sturdy nor alive.  A Christianity which disregards its origin in the Jesus of genuine