Yet are generally all rare things and such as breede maruell & admiration somewhat holding of the vndecent, as when a man is bigger & exceeding the ordinary stature of a man like a Giaunt, or farre vnder the reasonable and common size of men as a dwarfe, and such vndecencies do not angre vs, but either we pittie them or scorne at them.
But at all insolent and vnwoonted partes of a mans
behauiour, we find many times cause to mislike or
to be mistrustfull, which proceedeth of some vndecency
that is in it, as when a man that hath alwaies bene
strange and vnacquainted with vs, will suddenly become
our familiar and domestick: and another that
hath bene alwaies sterne and churlish, wilbe vpon the
suddaine affable and curteous, it is neyther a comely
sight, nor a signe of any good towards vs. Which
the subtill Italian well obserued by the successes
thereof, saying in Prouerbe.
Chi me fa meglio chenon fuole,
Tradito me ha o tradir me vuolo.
He that speakes me fairer, than his woont
was too
Hath done me harme, or meanes for to doo._
Now againe all maner of conceites that stirre vp any vehement passion in a man, doo it by some turpitude or euill and vndecency that is in them, as to make a man angry there must be some iniury or contempt offered, to make him enuy there must proceede some vndeserued prosperitie of his egall or inferiour, to make him pitie some miserable fortune or spectakle to behold.
And yet in euery of the these passions being as it were vndecencies, there is a comelinesse to be discerned, which some men can keepe and some men can not, as to be angry, or to enuy, or to hate, or to pitie, or to be ashamed decently, that is none otherwise then reason requireth. This surmise appeareth to be true, for Homer the father of Poets writing that famous and most honourable poeme called the Iliades or warres of Troy: made his commencement the magnanimous wrath and anger of Achilles in his first verse thus: [Greek: illegible] Sing foorth my muse the wrath of Achilles Peleus sonne: which the Poet would neuer haue done if the wrath of a prince had not beene in some sort comely & allowable. But when Arrianus and Curtius historiographers that wrote the noble gestes of king Alexander the great, came to prayse him for many things, yet for his wrath and anger they reproched him, because it proceeded not of any magnanimitie, but vpon surfet & distemper in his diet, not growing of any iust causes, was exercised to the destruction of his dearest friends and familiers, and not of his enemies nor any other waies so honorably as th’others was, and so could not be reputed a decent and comely anger.