The JURYMAN:  I would na’ touch it with a pitchfork.  Such books should be burnt.  And this Madame Blavatsky’s book—­what is that?  Is that also pheelosophy?

WITNESS:  No.  It is Theosophy. (Laughter.)

Mr. Allan Smith, secretary of the Tram-men’s Union, stated that he had had an interview with the deceased on the day before his death, when he (the deceased) spoke hopefully of the prospects of the movement, and wrote him out a check for ten guineas for his Union.  Deceased promised to speak at a meeting called for a quarter past seven A.M. the next day.

Mr. Edward Wimp, of the Scotland Yard Detective Department, said that the letters and papers of the deceased threw no light upon the manner of his death, and they would be handed back to the family.  His Department had not formed any theory on the subject.

The coroner proceeded to sum up the evidence.  “We have to deal, gentlemen,” he said, “with a most incomprehensible and mysterious case, the details of which are yet astonishingly simple.  On the morning of Tuesday, the 4th inst., Mrs. Drabdump, a worthy hard-working widow, who lets lodgings at 11 Glover Street, Bow, was unable to arouse the deceased, who occupied the entire upper floor of the house.  Becoming alarmed, she went across to fetch Mr. George Grodman, a gentleman known to us all by reputation, and to whose clear and scientific evidence we are much indebted, and got him to batter in the door.  They found the deceased lying back in bed with a deep wound in his throat.  Life had only recently become extinct.  There was no trace of any instrument by which the cut could have been effected:  there was no trace of any person who could have effected the cut.  No person could apparently have got in or out.  The medical evidence goes to show that the deceased could not have inflicted the wound himself.  And yet, gentlemen, there are, in the nature of things, two—­and only two—­alternative explanations of his death.  Either the wound was inflicted by his own hand, or it was inflicted by another’s.  I shall take each of these possibilities separately.  First, did the deceased commit suicide?  The medical evidence says deceased was lying with his hands clasped behind his head.  Now the wound was made from right to left, and terminated by a cut on the left thumb.  If the deceased had made it he would have had to do it with his right hand, while his left hand remained under his head—­a most peculiar and unnatural position to assume.  Moreover, in making a cut with the right hand, one would naturally move the hand from left to right.  It is unlikely that the deceased would move his right hand so awkwardly and unnaturally, unless, of course, his object was to baffle suspicion.  Another point is that on this hypothesis, the deceased would have had to replace his right hand beneath his head.  But Dr. Robinson believes that death was instantaneous.  If so, deceased could have had no time to pose so neatly.