Another, who the name of danger loaths,
Vow’d he would go, and swore me
forty oaths,
But that his horses were in body-clothes.
A third cried,—Damn my blood,
I’ll be content
To push my fortune, if the parliament
Would but recal claret from banishment.
A fourth (and I have done) made this excuse—
I’d draw my sword in Ireland, sir,
to chuse;
Had not their women gouty legs, and wore
no shoes.
Well, I may march, thought I, and fight,
and trudge,
But, of these blades, the devil a man
will budge;
They there would fight, e’en just
as here they judge.
Here they will pay for leave to find a
fault;
But, when their honour calls, they can’t
be bought;
Honour in danger, blood, and wounds is
sought.
Lost virtue, whither fled? or where’s
thy dwelling
Who can reveal? at least, ’tis past
my telling,
Unless thou art embarked for Inniskilling.
On carrion-tits those sparks denounce
their rage,
In boot of wisp and Leinster frise engage;
What would you do in such an equipage[3]?
The siege of Derry does you gallants threaten;
Not out of errant shame of being beaten,
As fear of wanting meat, or being eaten.
Were wit like honour, to be won by fighting,
How few just judges would there be of
writing!
Then you would leave this villainous back-biting.
Your talents lie how to express your spite;
But, where is he who knows to praise aright?
You praise like cowards, but like critics
fight.
Ladies, be wise, and wean these yearling
calves,
Who, in your service too, are meer faux
braves;
They judge, and write, and fight, and
love—by halves.
Footnotes:
1. The humour of this intended prologue turns
upon the unwillingness
displayed to attend King William
into Ireland by many of the
nobility and gentry, who had taken
arms at the Revolution. The
truth is, that, though invited to
go as volunteers, they could not
but consider themselves as hostages,
of whom William did not chuse
to lose sight, lest, while he was
conquering Ireland, he might,
perchance, lose England, by means
of the very men by whom he had
won it. The disbanding of the
royal regiment had furnished a
subject for the satirical wit of
Buckingham, at least, such a piece
is printed in his Miscellanies;
and for that of Shadwell, in his
epilogue to Bury-fair. But
Shadwell was now poet-laureat, and his
satire was privileged, like the
wit of the ancient royal jester.
Our author was suspected of disaffection,
and liable to
misconstruction: For which
reason, probably, he declined this
sarcastic prologue, and substituted
that which follows, the tone of
which is submissive, and conciliatory
towards the government.
Contrary to custom, it was spoken
by a woman.