The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol 1, Issue 4, January 23, 1915 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 432 pages of information about The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol 1, Issue 4, January 23, 1915.

The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol 1, Issue 4, January 23, 1915 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 432 pages of information about The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol 1, Issue 4, January 23, 1915.

The latter began at once to descend as if either he or his machine were hit, and shutting off his engine and volplaning to free his hands, the pursuer recharged his magazine.  Unfortunately it jammed, but he managed to insert four cartridges and to fire them at his descending opponent, who disappeared into a cloud bank with dramatic suddenness.  When the British officer emerged below the clouds he could see no sign of the other.  He, therefore, climbed to an altitude of some 7,000 feet and came to the conclusion that the German must have come to earth in the French lines.

The French airmen, too, have been very successful during the last three days, having dropped several bombs among the German cavalry and caused considerable loss and disorder, and having by similar means silenced a battery of field howitzers.

The German anti-aircraft guns recently have been unusually active.  From their rate of fire they seem to be nearly automatic, but so far they have not had much effect in reducing the air reconnoissances carried out by us.

A striking feature of our line—­to use the conventional term which so seldom expresses accurately the position taken up by an army—­is that it consists really of a series of trenches not all placed alongside each other, but some more advanced than others, and many facing in different directions.  At one place they run east and west along one side of a valley.  At another almost north and south up some subsidiary valley.  Here they line the edge of woods, and there they are on the reverse slope of a hill, or possibly along a sunken road, and at different points both the German and the British trenches jut out like promontories into what might be regarded as the opponents’ territory.

Though both sides have moved forward at certain points, and withdrawn at others, no very important change has been effected in their dispositions, in spite of the enemy’s repeated counter attacks.  These have been directed principally against one portion of the position won by us, but in spite of the lavish expenditure of life they have not so far succeeded in driving us back.

The situation of the works in the German front line as a whole has been a matter of deliberate selection, for they have had the advantage of previous reconnaissance, being first in the field.

Behind the front they now have several lines prepared for a step-by-step defense.  Another point which might cause astonishment to a visitor to our intrenchments is the evident indifference displayed to the provision of an extended field of frontal rifle fire, which is generally accepted as being one of the great requirements of a defensive position.  It is still desirable, if it can be obtained without the usually accompanying drawback of exposure to the direct fire of hostile artillery, but experience has shown that a short field of fire is sufficient to beat back the infantry assaults of the enemy, and by giving up direct fire at long or medium ranges and placing our trenches on the reverse slope of a hill or behind the crest, it is in many places possible to gain shelter from the frontal fire of the German guns, for the men are well trained in musketry and under good fire control, and the dead ground beyond the short range from their position has comparatively small terrors.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol 1, Issue 4, January 23, 1915 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.