Lastly, Solon decreed that all those who had been condemned by the archons to atimy (civil disfranchisement) should be restored to their full privileges of citizens—­excepting, however, from this indulgence those who had been condemned by the Ephetae, or by the Areopagus, or by the Phylo-Basileis (the four kings of the tribes), after trial in the Prytaneum, on charges either of murder or treason.  So wholesale a measure of amnesty affords strong grounds for believing that the previous judgments of the archons had been intolerably harsh; and it is to be recollected that the Draconian ordinances were then in force.

Such were the measures of relief with which Solon met the dangerous discontent then prevalent.  That the wealthy men and leaders of the people—­whose insolence and iniquity he has himself severely denounced in his poems, and whose views in nominating him he had greatly disappointed—­should have detested propositions which robbed them without compensation of many legal rights, it is easy to imagine.  But the statement of Plutarch that the poor emancipated debtors were also dissatisfied, from having expected that Solon would not only remit their debts, but also redivide the soil of Attica, seems utterly incredible; nor is it confirmed by any passage now remaining of the Solonian poems.  Plutarch conceives the poor debtors as having in their minds the comparison with Lycurgus and the equality of property at Sparta, which, in my opinion, is clearly a matter of fiction; and even had it been true as a matter of history long past and antiquated, would not have been likely to work upon the minds of the multitude of Attica in the forcible way that the biographer supposes.  The Seisachtheia must have exasperated the feelings and diminished the fortunes of many persons; but it gave to the large body of Thetes and small proprietors all that they could possibly have hoped.  We are told that after a short interval it became eminently acceptable in the general public mind, and procured for Solon a great increase of popularity—­all ranks concurring in a common sacrifice of thanksgiving and harmony.  One incident there was which occasioned an outcry of indignation.  Three rich friends of Solon, all men of great family in the state, and bearing names which appear in history as borne by their descendants—­namely:  Conon, Cleinias, and Hipponicus—­having obtained from Solon some previous hint of his designs, profited by it, first to borrow money, and next to make purchases of lands; and this selfish breach of confidence would have disgraced Solon himself, had it not been found that he was personally a great loser, having lent money to the extent of five talents.