of Sixtus IV., which involves that pontiff deeply
in the assassination projected by the Pazzi; but he
carefully suppressed its notice: yet, in his conscience,
he could not avoid alluding to such documents, which
he concealed by his silence. Roscoe has apologised
for Fabroni overlooking this decisive evidence of
the guilt of the hypocritical pontiff in the mass of
manuscripts; a circumstance not likely to have occurred,
however, to this laborious historical inquirer.
All party feeling is the same active spirit with an
opposite direction. We have a remarkable case,
where a most interesting historical production has
been silently annihilated by the consent of both
parties. There once existed an important diary
of a very extraordinary character, Sir George Saville,
afterwards Marquis of Halifax. This master-spirit,
for such I am inclined to consider the author of the
little book of “Maxims and Reflections,”
with a philosophical indifference, appears to have
held in equal contempt all the factions of his times,
and consequently has often incurred their severe censures.
Among other things, the Marquis of Halifax had noted
down the conversation he had had with Charles the Second,
and the great and busy characters of the age.
Of this curious secret history there existed two copies,
and the noble writer imagined that by this means he
had carefully secured their existence; yet both copies
were destroyed from opposite motives; the one at the
instigation of Pope, who was alarmed at finding some
of the catholic intrigues of the court developed;
and the other at the suggestion of a noble friend,
who was equally shocked at discovering that his party,
the Revolutionists, had sometimes practised mean and
dishonourable deceptions. It is in these legacies
of honourable men, of whatever party they may be, that
we expect to find truth and sincerity; but thus it
happens that the last hope of posterity is frustrated
by the artifices, or the malignity, of these party-passions.
Pulteney, afterwards the Earl of Bath, had also prepared
memoirs of his times, which he proposed to confide
to Dr. Douglas, bishop of Salisbury, to be composed
by the bishop; but his lordship’s heir, the
General, insisted on destroying these authentic documents,
of the value of which we have a notion by one of those
conversations which the earl was in the habit of indulging
with Hooke, whom he at that time appears to have intended
for his historian. The Earl of Anglesea’s
MS. History of the Troubles of Ireland, and also a
Diary of his own Times, have been suppressed; a busy
observer of his contemporaries, his tale would materially
have assisted a later historian.