Preface to the Works of Shakespeare (1734) eBook

Lewis Theobald
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 68 pages of information about Preface to the Works of Shakespeare (1734).

Preface to the Works of Shakespeare (1734) eBook

Lewis Theobald
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 68 pages of information about Preface to the Works of Shakespeare (1734).
to his Facility in Writing; as his Employment, as a Player, gave him an Advantage and Habit of fancying himself the very Character he meant to delineate.  He used the Helps of his Function in forming himself to create and express that Sublime, which other Actors can only copy, and throw out, in Action and graceful Attitude.  But Nullum fine Venia placuit Ingenium, says Seneca.  The Genius, that gives us the greatest Pleasure, sometimes stands in Need of our Indulgence.  Whenever this happens with regard to Shakespeare, I would willingly impute it to a Vice of his Times.  We see Complaisance enough, in our own Days, paid to a bad Taste.  His Clinches, false Wit, and descending beneath himself, seem to be a Deference paid to reigning Barbarism.  He was a Sampson in Strength, but he suffer’d some such Dalilah to give him up to the Philistines.

As I have mention’d the Sweetness of his Disposition, I am tempted to make a Reflexion or two on a Sentiment of his, which, I am persuaded, came from the Heart.

  The Man, that hath no Musick in himself,
  Nor is not mov’d with Concord of sweet Sounds,
  Is fit for Treasons, Stratagems, and Spoils: 
  The Motions of his Spirit are dull as Night,
  And his Affections dark as Erebus
  Let no such Man be trusted.——­

    [Sidenote:  A Lover of Musick.]

Shakespeare was all Openness, Candour, and Complacence; and had such a Share of Harmony in his Frame and Temperature, that we have no Reason to doubt, from a Number of fine Passages, Allusions, Similies, &_c._ fetch’d from Musick, but that He was a passionate Lover of it.  And to this, perhaps, we may owe that great Number of Sonnets, which are sprinkled thro’ his Plays.  I have found, that the Stanza’s sung by the Gravedigger in Hamlet, are not of Shakespeare’s own Composition, but owe their Original to the old Earl of Surrey’s Poems.  Many other of his Occasional little Songs, I doubt not, but he purposely copied from his Contemporary Writers; sometimes, out of Banter; sometimes, to do them Honour.  The Manner of their Introduction, and the Uses to which he has assigned them, will easily determine for which of the Reasons they are respectively employ’d.  In As you like it, there are several little Copies of Verses on Rosalind, which are said to be the right Butter-woman’s Rank to Market, and the very false Gallop of Verses.  Dr. Thomas Lodge, a Physician who flourish’d early in Queen Elizabeth’s Reign, and was a great Writer of the Pastoral Songs and Madrigals, which were so much the Strain of those Times, composed a whole Volume of Poems in Praise of his Mistress, whom he calls Rosalinde.  I never yet could meet with this Collection; but whenever I do, I am persuaded, I shall find many of our Author’s Canzonets on this Subject to be Scraps of the Doctor’s amorous Muse:  as, perhaps, those by Biron too, and the other Lovers in Love’s Labour’s lost, may prove to be.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Preface to the Works of Shakespeare (1734) from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.