So far, Mr. Lincoln’s new duties as President of the United States had not in any wise put him at a disadvantage with his constitutional advisers. Upon the old question of slavery he was as well informed and had clearer convictions and purposes than either Seward or Chase. And upon the newer question of secession, and the immediate decision about Fort Sumter which it involved, the members of his cabinet were, like himself, compelled to rely on the professional advice of experienced army and navy officers. Since these differed radically in their opinions, the President’s own powers of perception and logic were as capable of forming a correct decision as men who had been governors and senators. He had reached at least a partial decision in the memorandum he gave Fox to prepare ships for the Sumter expedition.
It must therefore have been a great surprise to the President when, on April 1, Secretary of State Seward handed him a memorandum setting forth a number of most extraordinary propositions. For a full enumeration of the items the reader must carefully study the entire document, which is printed below in a foot-note;[4] but the principal points for which it had evidently been written and presented can be given in a few sentences.
[Footnote 4: SOME THOUGHTS FOR THE PRESIDENT’S
CONSIDERATION. APRIL
1, 1861.
First. We are at the end of a month’s
administration, and yet
without a policy, either domestic or foreign.
Second. This, however, is not culpable, and it has even been unavoidable. The presence of the Senate, with the need to meet applications for patronage, have prevented attention to other and more grave matters.
Third. But further delay to adopt and prosecute
our policies for
both domestic and foreign affairs would not
only bring scandal on
the administration, but danger upon the country.
Fourth. To do this we must dismiss the
applicants for office. But
how? I suggest that we make the local appointments
forthwith,
leaving foreign or general ones for ulterior
and occasional action.
Fifth. The policy at home. I am aware
that my views are singular
and perhaps not sufficiently explained My system
is built upon this
idea as a ruling one, namely, that we must