The Scripture is no one summary of doctrines regularly digested, in which, a man could not mistake his way.  It is a most venerable, but most multifarious, collection of the records of the divine economy:  a collection of an infinite variety,—­of cosmogony, theology, history, prophecy, psalmody, morality, apologue, allegory, legislation, ethics, carried through different books, by different authors, at different ages, for different ends and purposes.  It is necessary to sort out what is intended for example, what only as narrative,—­what to be understood literally, what figuratively,—­where one precept is to be controlled and modified by another,—­what is used directly, and what only as an argument ad hominem,—­what is temporary, and what of perpetual obligation,—­what appropriated to one state and to one set of men, and what the general duty of all Christians.  If we do not get some security for this, we not only permit, but we actually pay for, all the dangerous fanaticism which, can be produced to corrupt our people, and to derange the public worship of the country.  We owe the best we can (not infallibility, but prudence) to the subject,—­first sound doctrine, then ability to use it.

SPEECH

ON

A bill for the relief of protestant dissenters.

March 17, 1773.

NOTE.

This speech is given partly from the manuscript papers of Mr. Burke, and partly from a very imperfect short-hand note taken at the time by a member of the House of Commons.  The bill under discussion was opposed by petitions from several congregations calling themselves “Protestant Dissenters,” who appear to have been principally composed of the people who are generally known under the denomination of “Methodists,” and particularly by a petition from a congregation of that description residing in the town of Chatham.

SPEECH.

I assure you, Sir, that the honorable gentleman who spoke last but one need not be in the least fear that I should make a war of particles upon his opinion, whether the Church of England should, would, or ought to be alarmed.  I am very clear that this House has no one reason in the world to think she is alarmed by the bill brought before you.  It is something extraordinary that the only symptom of alarm in the Church of England should appear in the petition of some Dissenters, with whom, I believe very few in this House are yet acquainted, and of whom you know no more than that you are assured by the honorable gentleman that they are not Mahometans.  Of the Church we know they are not, by the name that they assume.  They are, then, Dissenters.  The first symptom of an alarm, comes from some Dissenters assembled round the lines of Chatham:  these lines become the security of the Church of England!  The honorable gentleman, in speaking of the lines of Chatham, tells us that they serve not only for the security of the wooden walls of England, but for the defence of the Church of England.  I suspect the wooden walls of England secure the lines of Chatham, rather than the lines of Chatham secure the wooden walls of England.