flesh”—­i.e., naturally born—­“is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.” Wherever there is a birth of the flesh, there must be a birth of the Spirit.  The flesh-born cannot even see the kingdom of God, much less enjoy it, still less possess it.  There must be new life, divine life, spiritual life breathed into that fleshly, carnal nature.  Thus will there be a new heart; a new spirit, a new creature.  Then, and not till then, can there be comprehension, apprehension and appreciation of the things of the kingdom of God.  This is the teaching of the whole Word of God.  Gal. vi. 15:  “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature”—­i.e., neither Jewish birth nor Gentile birth, without the new birth.

Here also then our Church confesses the pure truth of God’s Word, when, in the second Article of the Augsburg Confession, as quoted above, she goes on to say:  “And this disease, or original fault, is truly sin, condemning and bringing eternal death upon all that are not born again.”

Here then we take our stand.  No child can be saved unless it be first reached by renewing Grace.  If ever an infant did die, or should die, in that state in which it was born, unchanged by divine Grace, that infant is lost.  There are, there can be, no unregenerate souls in heaven.  Where there is no infant regeneration, there can be no infant salvation.

Here also we remark, in passing, that this doctrine, of the absolute necessity of infant regeneration, is not held by the Lutheran Church alone.  Even the Romish and Greek Churches teach that it is impossible for any human creature, without a change from that condition in which he was born, to enter heaven.  All the great historic confessions of the Protestant churches confess the same truth.  Even the Calvinistic Baptists confess the necessity of infant regeneration.

In short all churches that have paid much attention to theology, and have been careful to have consistent systems of doctrine, agree on this point.  However much those who call themselves by their names may deny it, in their preaching and in their conversation, their own confessions of faith and their greatest and best theologians clearly teach it.

Yes, there must be infant regeneration.  But is it possible?  Can the Grace of God reach the helpless infant?  Will He reach down and make it a new creature in Christ Jesus?  Has He made provision for this end?  Yes, thanks be to his abounding Grace, we believe He can and will save the child, and has committed to His spouse, the Church, a means of Grace for this purpose.  He, of whom it was prophesied long before He came, that He would “gather the lambs in His arms and carry them in His bosom;” who made it the first duty of the reinstated apostle to feed His lambs, must have a special care for them.  It is not His or His Father’s will “that one of them should perish.”  He has made provision for these sin-stricken ones, whereby His Grace can reach down to renew and heal them.  There is Balm in Gilead.  The Great Physician is there.  The Church need only apply His divine, life-giving remedy.  Of this we will speak in the next chapter.