in that Language. It is without Controversie,
that he had no knowledge of the Writings of the Antient
Poets, not only from this Reason, but from his Works
themselves, where we find no traces of any thing that
looks like an Imitation of ’em; the Delicacy
of his Taste, and the natural Bent of his own Great
Genius, equal, if not superior to some of the
best of theirs, would certainly have led him to Read
and Study ’em with so much Pleasure, that some
of their fine Images would naturally have insinuated
themselves into, and been mix’d with his own
Writings; so that his not copying at least something
from them, may be an Argument of his never having
read ’em. Whether his Ignorance of the
Antients were a disadvantage to him or no, may admit
of a Dispute: For tho’ the knowledge of
’em might have made him more Correct, yet it
is not improbable but that the Regularity and Deference
for them, which would have attended that Correctness,
might have restrain’d some of that Fire, Impetuosity,
and even beautiful Extravagance which we admire in
Shakespear: And I believe we are better
pleas’d with those Thoughts, altogether New
and Uncommon, which his own Imagination supply’d
him so abundantly with, than if he had given us the
most beautiful Passages out of the
Greek and
Latin Poets, and that in the most agreeable
manner that it was possible for a Master of the
English
Language to deliver ’em. Some
Latin
without question he did know, and one may see up and
down in his Plays how far his Reading that way went:
In
Love’s Labour lost, the Pedant comes
out with a Verse of
Mantuan; and in
Titus
Andronicus, one of the
Gothick Princes,
upon reading
Integer vitae scelerisque
purus
Non eget Mauri jaculis nec
arcu—
says, ’Tis a Verse in Horace, but
he remembers it out of his Grammar: Which,
I suppose, was the Author’s Case. Whatever
Latin he had, ’tis certain he understood
French, as may be observ’d from many
Words and Sentences scatter’d up and down his
Plays in that Language; and especially from one Scene
in Henry the Fifth written wholly in it.
Upon his leaving School, he seems to have given intirely
into that way of Living which his Father propos’d
to him; and in order to settle in the World after
a Family manner, he thought fit to marry while he was
yet very Young. His Wife was the Daughter of one
Hathaway, said to have been a substantial Yeoman
in the Neighbourhood of Stratford. In
this kind of Settlement he continu’d for some
time, ’till an Extravagance that he was guilty
of, forc’d him both out of his Country and that
way of Living which he had taken up; and tho’
it seem’d at first to be a Blemish upon his
good Manners, and a Misfortune to him, yet it afterwards
happily prov’d the occasion of exerting one of
the greatest Genius’s that ever was known
in Dramatick Poetry. He had, by a Misfortune