Scientific American Supplement, No. 623, December 10, 1887 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 122 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 623, December 10, 1887.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 623, December 10, 1887 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 122 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 623, December 10, 1887.

With tender wheels, as with our car wheels, the case was different.  Originally, the axle for the 5 ft. gauge was longer than for the 4 ft. 9 in.; but latterly the 5 ft. roads had used a great many master car builders’ axles for the 4 ft. 9 in. gauge, namely, 6 ft. 111/4 in. over all, thus making the width of the truck the same as for 4 ft. 9 in. gauge.  To do this a dished wheel, or rather a wheel with a greater dish by 11/2 in. than previously used, was needed, so that the tread of the wheel could be at its proper place. (See Fig. 25.) There were, of course, many of the wheels with small dish and long axles still in use.  Their treatment, however, when the day of change came, did not vary from that of the short axle.

[Illustration:  FIG. 24 and FIG. 25]

It had been the rule for some years that all axles should be turned back 11/2 in. further than needed; but unfortunately the rule had not been closely followed, and many were found not to be so turned.  To make the matter worse, quite a number of the wheels were found to have been counterbored about 1/2 in. deep at the back end, and the axle turned up to fit this counterbore; a good idea to prevent the running in, in case the wheel worked loose, but bad from the standpoint of a change of gauge.  In such cases the wheels had to be started off before the axle could be turned back, so that the wheels could be pushed on in their proper position. (Fig. 26.)

[Illustration:  FIG. 26]

If the work was done where they had a lathe large enough to swing a pair of wheels, they were pressed off but half an inch, the wheels swung in the lathe, the axles turned back 11/2 in., and the wheels then pressed on 2 in. or 11/2 in. inside of their first position.

Where no large lathe was in use, the wheels came entirely off before the axles could be turned back.  The work in the former case was both the quicker and the cheaper.  Where the large lathes were used they were either set down into the floor, so a pair of wheels would easily roll into place, or a raised platform was put before the lathe, with an incline up which the wheels were rolled and then taken to the lathe.  These arrangements were found much quicker and cheaper than to hoist the wheels up, as is usually done.

In pressing the wheels on, where the axles had previously been turned back, much trouble was at first experienced because of the rust that had gathered upon the turned part behind the wheel, forming a ridge over or upon which the wheel must be pushed.  Some of the roads, at the start, burst 10 or 15 per cent. of the wheels so pressed on.  By saturating this surface with coal oil, however, it was found that the rust was easily removed and little trouble was had.  It was found, sometimes, that upon axles newly turned back a careless workman would leave a ridge at the starting point of the turning.  Frequently also the axles were a little sprung, so that the new turning would be a little scant upon one side when compared with the old surface, and upon the opposite side a little full.  As an indication that these difficulties were overcome as they appeared, I will say that upon our line only 202 wheels burst out of nearly 27,000 pressed on—­an exceedingly small percentage.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Scientific American Supplement, No. 623, December 10, 1887 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.