[1] Thorndike, Edward: ‘A
Note on the Psychology of Fishes,’
American Naturalist. 1899,
Vol. XXXIII., pp. 923-925.
[2] Triplett, Norman: ‘The
Educability of the Perch,’ Amer.
Jour. Psy., 1901, Vol.
XII., pp. 354-360.
The only quantitative study of the associative processes of reptiles available is some work of mine on the formation of habits in the turtle.[3] In the light of that study I can say that the turtle learns much more rapidly than do fishes or frogs. Further observations on other species of turtles, as yet unpublished, confirm this conclusion.
[3] Yerkes, Robert Mearns:
’The Formation of Habits in the
Turtle,’ Popular Science
Monthly, 1901, Vol. LVIII., pp.
519-535.
For the frog it is necessary to measure and calculate the improvement in order to detect it at first, while with the turtle or chick the most casual observer cannot fail to note the change after a few trials. In connection with the quickness of the formation of associations it is of interest to inquire concerning their permanency. Do animals which learn slowly retain associations longer? is a question to which no answer can as yet be given, but experiments may readily be made to settle the matter. I have tested the frog for permanency, and also the turtle, but have insufficient data for comparison.
3. Sensory Data Contributing to the Associations.—Among the most important of the sensory data concerned in the labyrinth habit are the visual impressions received from the different colored walls, the slight differences in brightness of illumination due to shadows from the partitions and the contrast in form of the two sides of the labyrinth resulting from the use of the partitions, and the muscular sensations dependent upon the direction of turning. The experiments proved beyond question that vision and the direction