[8] This was probably due to beginning
the series of
stimulations with the typical measure.
Such beginning was
always made by chance.
In regard to the relative duration of the redundant
measure the subjective reports indicate a large variability.
The dactylic form appears to be slightly longer than
the trochaics among which it appears; but not infrequently
it is shorter.[9] These variations are probably connected
with differences in stress due to the relation which
the measure bears to the accentual initiation of the
whole series; for this accent apparently may fall
either within the redundant measure itself or on the
first element of the succeeding
___
_____
>/
\ > | | > >
group, thus: | q q q; q q; |, or | e e e q
q; q q |.
\_/
[9] The only form taken up was the
occurrence of dactylic
measures in trochaic series.
Two rhythm forms were analyzed, the trochaic and the dactylic, the series of sounds being given by hammer-falls of 7/8 and 1/8 inch for accented and unaccented elements respectively. In each experiment full and syncopated measures alternated regularly with each other in continuous succession, giving the forms
> > > > | q. q; q % | and | q. q q; q. % % |. \_____/ \____________/
The initiation of the series was in every case determined by chance. Six observers took part in the work with trochaic forms, five in that with dactylic. The quantitative results are given in the following tables, in each of which the relations of duration, position and stress are included.
TABLE LVI.
TROCHAIC FORM. Apparent Accentuation Ratio of 1st Second Group Judged to be 2d Group of Second Group. to 2d Group. + = — Final + = — 1.000:1.000 55.5% 44.4% 100% 71.5% 28.5% 1.000:0.946 83.3 16.6% 100 30.0 70.0 1.000:0.895 66.6 11.1 22.2 100 30.0 60.0 10.0% 1.000:0.846 16.6 41.6 41.6 100 40.0 60.0 1.000:0.800 16.6 41.6 41.6 100 40.0 60.0 1.000:0.756 49.9 24.9 24.9 100 40.0 60.0 1.000:0.714 16.6 41.6 41.6 100 20.0 80.0
TABLE LVII.
DACTYLIC FORM. Apparent Accentuation Ratio of 1st Second Group Judged to be 2d Group of Second Group. to 2d Group. + = — Final + = — 1.000:1.000 100.0% 100% 40.0% 60.0% 1.000:0.946 83.3% 16.6% 100 40.0 60.0 1.000:0.895 66.6 33.3 100 20.0 80.0 1.000:0.846 37.5 62.5 100 40.0 60.0 1.000:0.800 100.0 100 40.0 60.0