by reference to inequality in the metronomic intervals).
That the rhythmical phases which appear in the accompaniment
are not due to inequality in the stimulation intervals,
is shown by the reversal of relations between the metronome
and its accompaniment which occur in the midst of
a continuous series of taps. To speak roughly,
a break occurs every twentieth beat. I do not
refer to minor irregularities occurring within the
single group but not affecting the form of the rhythmical
accompaniment. The latter appeared with surprising
rarity, but when found were included in the continuous
calculation of averages. But in every score or
so of beats a stroke out of series would be interpolated,
giving the form | 1 >2 [1] 2 >1 |; the accompaniment
being cooerdinated during the second portion of the
whole series with opposite phases of the metronome
from those with which its elements were connected in
the earlier part. Moreover, the dependence of
this grouping of the sounds on subjective attitudes
may readily be made to appear. When attention
is turned keenly on the process its phases of rhythmical
differentiation decline; when the accompaniment becomes
mechanical they mount in value. When the observer
tries to mark the ticking as accurately as possible,
not only does the index of his motor reactions become
more constant, but the sounds of the instrument likewise
appear more uniform. The observers report also
that at one and the same time they are aware of the
regularity of the metronome and the rhythmical nature
of their tapping, while yet the conviction remains
that the accompaniment has been in time with the beats.
Furthermore, if the phases of ticking in the metronome
were temporarily unlike, the motor accompaniment by
a series of observers, if accurate, should reproduce
the time-values of the process, and if inaccurate,
should present only an increase of the mean variation,
without altering the characteristic relations of the
two phases. On the other hand, if the series be
uniform and subjectively rhythmized by the hearer,
there should be expected definite perversions of the
objective relations, presenting a series of increasing
departures from the original in proportion as the
tendency to rhythmize varied from individual to individual.
On the other hand, a rhythm is already presented in
the sounds of the metronome, occasioned by the qualitative
differentiation of the members of each pair of ticks,
a variation which it was impossible to eliminate and
which must be borne in mind in estimating the following
results.
Five reactors took part in the experiment, the results
of which are tabulated in the following pages.
The figures are based on series of one hundred reactions
for each subject, fifty accompaniments to each swing
and return of the metronome pendulum. When taken
in series of ten successive pairs of reactions, five
repetitions of the series will be given as the basis
of each average. The quantitative results are
stated in Tables VII.-XIV., which present the proportional
values of the time intervals elapsing between the
successive reactions of an accompaniment to the strokes
of a metronome beating at the rates of 60, 90 and
120 per minute.