A BROADENING OF THE DEFINITIONS.—In order to understand more plainly the complexity of this relation, we will not confine ourselves here to the narrower definition of a record as a written account, but will consider it to mean a registering of an experience in the mind, whether this expresses itself in a written record or not, A programme will, likewise, be a mental plan.
MANY POSSIBLE TYPES OF RECORDS AND PROGRAMMES.—In order to understand the number of different types of records and programmes that can be made for a worker, the table that follows may be examined (Table I). It exemplifies twelve possible records and twelve possible programmes.
TABLE I
/ / | |1. unconscious record | |2. conscious record, 1. Man -----| | not written | working | |3. written record | for | |4. standardized record | himself \ \ I. | RECORDS——| 1. unconscious record | |2. conscious record, not written | (a) One of a ---|3. written record | | gang |4. standardized record | | \ (a) made by man \2. Man -----| |(b) " " manager working | 1. unconscious |(a) made by man for | | record |(b) " " manager another | |2. conscious -|(a) made by man | | record, |(b) " " manager \(b) Individual -| not written |(a) made by man output |3. written |(b) " " manager | record |(a) made by man |4. standardize \(b) " " manager \ record
|1. unconscious programme 1. Man ------------------|2. conscious programme | working |3. written programme | for |4. standardized programme | himself \ II. | PROGRAMMES-| | 1. unconscious (a) made by man | (a) One of a ---| programme |(b) " " manager | | gang |2. conscious |(a) made by man | | | programme, |(b) " " manager \2. Man —| | not written -|(a) made by man working | |3. written |(b) " " manager for | | programme |(a) made by man another \(b) Individual -|4. standardized |(b) " " manager output | programme |(a) made by man \ \(b) " " manager
INTERRELATION OF THESE TYPES.—The man is classified first, as working for himself, or working for another. There will usually be a fundamental difference, at the outset, in the minds of these two men, for the man working for himself will be of a more independent cast of thought. There will be no question as to the man’s output showing up separately,