to those who desire to trace the master’s development
ab ovo. Both in the melodies and rhythms
employed it is possible to trace the germs of what
afterwards became strongely marked characteristics.
Wagner himself never saw ‘Die Feen’ performed.
In 1833 he could not persuade any German manager to
produce it, and, in the changes which soon came over
his musical sympathies, ‘Die Feen’ was
laid upon the shelf and probably forgotten. It
was not until 1888, five years after the composer’s
death, that the general enthusiasm for everything
connected with Wagner induced the authorities at Munich
to produce it. Since then it has been performed
with comparative frequency, and formed a part of the
cycles of Wagner’s works which were given in
1894 and 1895. Wagner’s next work was of
a very different nature. ’Das Liebesverbot’
was a frank imitation of the Italian school. He
himself confesses that ’if any one should compare
this score with that of “Die Feen” he
would find it difficult to understand how such a complete
change in my tendencies could have been brought about
in so short a time.’ The incident which
turned his thoughts into this new channel was a performance
of Bellini’s ‘Capuletti e Montecchi,’
in which Madame Schroeder-Devrient sang the part of
Romeo. This remarkable woman exercised in those
days an almost hypnotic influence upon Wagner, and
the beauty and force of this particular impersonation
impressed him so vividly that he relinquished his
admiration of Weber and the Teutonic school and plunged
headlong into the meretricious sensuousness of Italy.
The libretto of ‘Das Liebesverbot’ is founded
upon Shakespeare’s ‘Measure for Measure,’
It was performed for the first and only time at Magdeburg
in 1836, and failed completely; but it is only just
to say that its failure seems to have been due more
to insufficient rehearsal than to the weakness of
the score. After the success of ‘Die Feen’
at Munich, it naturally occurred to the authorities
there to revive Wagner’s one other juvenile
opera. The score of ‘Das Liebesverbot’
was accordingly unearthed, and the parts were allotted.
The first rehearsal, however, decided its fate.
The opera was so ludicrous and unblushing an imitation
of Donizetti and Bellini, that the artists could scarcely
sing for laughter. Herr Vogl, the eminent tenor,
and one or two others were still in favour of giving
it as a curiosity, but in the end it was thought better
to drop it altogether, less on account of the music
than because of the licentious character of the libretto.
‘Rienzi,’ the next in order of Wagner’s operas, was written on the lines of French opera. Wagner hoped to see it performed in Paris, and throughout the score he kept the methods of Meyerbeer and Spontini consistently in his mind’s eye. There is very little attempt at characterisation, but the opportunities for spectacular display are many and various. In later years Meyerbeer paid Wagner the compliment of saying that the libretto of ‘Rienzi’ was the best he had ever read. ‘Rienzi’ was produced at Dresden in 1842.