But it is best to regard these privately performed
works merely as experiments, and to date the actual
foundation of opera from the year 1600, when a public
performance of Peri’s ‘Euridice’
was given at Florence in honour of the marriage of
Maria de’ Medici and Henry IV. of France.
A few years later a printed edition of this work was
published at Venice, a copy of which is now in the
library of the British Museum, and in recent times
it has been reprinted, so that those who are curious
in these matters can study this protoplasmic opera
at their leisure. Expect for a few bars of insignificant
chorus, the whole work consists of the accompanied
recitative, which was the invention of these Florentine
reformers. The voices are accompanied by a violin,
chitarone (a large guitar),
lira grande,
liuto grosso, and
gravicembalo or harpsichord,
which filled in the harmonies indicated by the figured
bass. The instrumental portions of the work are
poor and thin, and the chief beauty lies in the vocal
part, which is often really pathetic and expressive.
Peri evidently tried to give musical form to the ordinary
inflections of the human voice, how successfully may
be seen in the Lament of Orpheus which Mr. Morton
Latham has reprinted in his ‘Renaissance of Music,’
The original edition of ‘Euridice’ contains
an interesting preface, in which the composer sets
forth the theory upon which he worked, and the aims
which he had in view. It is too long to be reprinted
here, but should be read by all interested in the
early history of opera.
With the production of ‘Euridice’ the
history of opera may be said to begin; but if the
new art-form had depended only upon the efforts of
Peri and his friends, it must soon have languished
and died. With all their enthusiasm, the little
band of Florentines had too slight an acquaintance
with the science of music to give proper effect to
the ideas which they originated. Peri built the
ship, but it was reserved for the genius of Claudio
Monteverde to launch it upon a wider ocean than his
predecessor could have dreamed of. Monteverde
had been trained in the polyphonic school of Palestrina,
but his genius had never acquiesced in the rules and
restrictions in which the older masters delighted.
He was a poor contrapuntist, and his madrigals are
chiefly interesting as a proof of how ill the novel
harmonies of which he was the discoverer accorded
with the severe purity of the older school But in
the new art he found the field his genius required.
What had been weakness and license in the madrigal
became strength and beauty in the opera. The
new wine was put into new bottles, and both were preserved.
Monteverde produced his ‘Arianna’ in 1607,
and his ‘Orfeo’ in 1608, and with these
two works started opera upon the path of development
which was to culminate in the works of Wagner.
‘Arianna,’ which, according to Marco da
Gagliano, himself a rival composer of high ability,
’visibly moved all the theatre to tears,’