[144] [The facsimile of that portion of the tapestry
which is supposed to
be a portrait of Harold, and
which Mr. Lewis, who travelled with me,
executed, is perhaps of its
kind, one of the most perfect things
extant. In saying this,
I only deliver the opinions of very many
competent judges. It
must however be noticed, that the Society of
Antiquaries published the
whole series of this exceedingly curious and
ancient Representation of
the Conquest of our Country by William I. Of
this publication, the figures
measure about four inches in height: but
there is also a complete,
and exceedingly successful fac-simile of the
first two figures of this
series—of the size of the originals
(William I. and the Messenger
coming to announce to him the landing of
Harold in England) also published
from the same quarter. The whole of
these Drawings were from the
pencil of the late ingenious and justly
lamented THOS. STOTHARD,
Esq. Draftsman to the Society of
Antiquaries.]
[145] A complete copy is of rarity in our own country,
but not so abroad.
It is yet, however, an imperfect
work.
[146] There have been bibliographers, and there are
yet knowing
book-collectors, who covet
this edition in preference to the Leipsic
impression of Sir T. More’s
Works of 1698; in folio. But this must
proceed from sheer obstinacy;
or rather, perhaps, from ignorance that
the latter edition contains
the Utopia—whereas in the former
it is
unaccountably omitted to be
reprinted—which it might have been, from
various previous editions.
[147] This figure is introduced with pursuivants and
dogs: but great
liberties, as a nice eye will
readily discern, have been taken by
Montfaucon, when compared
with the original—of which the fac-simile,
in the previous edition of
this work, may be pronounced to be PERFECT.
[148] Something similar may be seen round the border
of the baptismal vase
of St. Louis, in Millin’s
Antiquites Nationales. A part of the
border in the Tapestry is
a representation of subjects from Aesop’s
Fables.
[149] Of a monument, which has been pronounced by
one of our ablest
antiquaries to be “THE
NOBLEST IN THE WORLD RELATING TO OUR OLD
ENGLISH HISTORY,” (See
Stukely’s Palaeog. Britan. Number
XI.
1746, 4to. p. 2-3) it may
be expected that some archaeological
discussion should be here
subjoined. Yet I am free to confess that,
after the essays of Messrs.
Gurney, Stothard, and Amyot, (and more
especially that of the latter
gentleman) the matter—as to the period
of its execution—may
be considered as well nigh, if not wholly, at
rest. These essays appear
in the XVIIIth and XIXth volumes of the
Archaeologia. The Abbe