He ceased; and
then gan all the quire of birds
Their
divers notes to attune unto his lay,
As in approvance
of his pleasing wordes.
The
constant pair heard all that he did say,
Yet swerved not,
but kept their forward way
Through
many covert groves and thickets close,
In which they
creeping did at last display [3]
That
wanton lady with her lover loose,
Whose sleepy head
she in her lap did soft dispose.
Upon a bed of
roses she was laid
As
faint through heat, or dight to pleasant sin;
And was arrayed
or rather disarrayed,
All
in a veil of silk and silver thin,
That hid no whit
her alabaster skin,
But
rather shewed more white, if more might be:
More subtle web
Arachne cannot spin;
Nor
the fine nets, which oft we woven see
Of scorched dew,
do not in the air more lightly flee.
Her snowy breast
was bare to greedy spoil
Of
hungry eyes which n’ ote therewith be fill’d,
And yet through
languor of her late sweet toil
Few
drops more clear than nectar forth distill’d,
That like pure
Orient perles adown it trill’d;
And
her fair eyes sweet smiling in delight
Moisten’d
their fiery beams, with which she thrill’d
Frail
hearts, yet quenched not; like starry light,
Which sparkling
on the silent waves does seem more bright.”
___ [2] Taken from Tasso. [3] This word is an instance of those unwarrantable freedoms which Spenser sometimes took with language. ___
The finest things in Spenser are, the character of Una, in the first book; the House of Pride; the Cave of Mammon, and the Cave of Despair; the account of Memory, of whom it is said, among other things,
“The wars
he well remember’d of King Nine,
Of old Assaracus
and Inachus divine”;
the description of Belphoebe; the story of Florimel and the Witch’s son; the Gardens of Adonis, and the Bower of Bliss; the Mask of Cupid; and Colin Clout’s vision, in the last book. But some people will say that all this may be very fine, but that they cannot understand it on account of the allegory. They are afraid of the allegory, as if they thought it would bite them: they look at it as a child looks at a painted dragon, and think it will strangle them in its shining folds. This is very idle. If they do not meddle with the allegory, the allegory will not meddle with them. Without minding it at all, the whole is as plain as a pike-staff. It might as well be pretended that we cannot see Poussin’s pictures for the allegory, as that the allegory prevents us from understanding Spenser. For instance, when Britomart, seated amidst the young warriors, lets fall her hair and discovers her sex, is it necessary to know the part she plays in the allegory, to understand the beauty of the following stanza?