In art, however, I understand that it does not do to be headlong, but patient and laborious—­and there is a love strong enough, even in me, to overcome nature.  I apprehend what you mean in the criticism you just intimate, and shall turn it over and over in my mind until I get practical good from it.  What no mere critic sees, but what you, an artist, know, is the difference between the thing desired and the thing attained, between the idea in the writer’s mind and the [Greek:  eidolon] cast off in his work.  All the effort—­the quick’ning of the breath and beating of the heart in pursuit, which is ruffling and injurious to the general effect of a composition; all which you call ‘insistency,’ and which many would call superfluity, and which is superfluous in a sense—­you can pardon, because you understand.  The great chasm between the thing I say, and the thing I would say, would be quite dispiriting to me, in spite even of such kindnesses as yours, if the desire did not master the despondency.  ’Oh for a horse with wings!’ It is wrong of me to write so of myself—­only you put your finger on the root of a fault, which has, to my fancy, been a little misapprehended.  I do not say everything I think (as has been said of me by master-critics) but I take every means to say what I think, which is different!—­or I fancy so!

In one thing, however, you are wrong.  Why should you deny the full measure of my delight and benefit from your writings?  I could tell you why you should not.  You have in your vision two worlds, or to use the language of the schools of the day, you are both subjective and objective in the habits of your mind.  You can deal both with abstract thought and with human passion in the most passionate sense.  Thus, you have an immense grasp in Art; and no one at all accustomed to consider the usual forms of it, could help regarding with reverence and gladness the gradual expansion of your powers.  Then you are ‘masculine’ to the height—­and I, as a woman, have studied some of your gestures of language and intonation wistfully, as a thing beyond me far! and the more admirable for being beyond.

Of your new work I hear with delight.  How good of you to tell me.  And it is not dramatic in the strict sense, I am to understand—­(am I right in understanding so?) and you speak, in your own person ’to the winds’? no—­but to the thousand living sympathies which will awake to hear you.  A great dramatic power may develop itself otherwise than in the formal drama; and I have been guilty of wishing, before this hour (for reasons which I will not thrust upon you after all my tedious writing), that you would give the public a poem unassociated directly or indirectly with the stage, for a trial on the popular heart.  I reverence the drama, but—­

But I break in on myself out of consideration for you.  I might have done it, you will think, before.  I vex your ’serene sleep of the virtuous’ like a nightmare.  Do not say ‘No.’  I am sure I do!  As to the vain parlance of the world, I did not talk of the ’honour of your acquaintance’ without a true sense of honour, indeed; but I shall willingly exchange it all (and now, if you please, at this moment, for fear of worldly mutabilities) for the ’delight of your friendship.’