remained in the possession of the Persians as the
prize of their victory over Valerian, and could only
be obtained by wresting it from the hands into which
it had fallen. Odenathus did not shrink from
this contest. It had been with some reason conjectured
that Sapor must have been at this time occupied with
troubles which had broken out on the eastern side of
his empire. At any rate, it appears that Odenathus,
after a short contest with Macriarius and his son,
Quietus, turned his arms once more, about A.D. 263,
against the Persians, crossed the Euphrates into Mesopotamia,
took Oarrhee and Nisibis, defeated Sapor and some
of his sons in a battle, and drove the entire Persian
host in confusion to the gates of Ctesiphon. He
even ventured to form the siege of that city; but
it was not long before effectual relief arrived; from
all the provinces flocked in contingents for the defence
of the Western capital; several engagements were fought,
in some of which Odenathus was defeated; and at last
he found himself involved in difficulties through
his ignorance of the localities, and so thought it
best to retire. Apparently his retreat was undisturbed;
he succeeded in carrying off his booty and his prisoners,
among whom were several satraps, and he retained possession
of Mesopotamia, which continued to form a part of
the Palmyrene kingdom until the capture of Zenobia
by Aurelian (A.D. 273).
The successes of Odenathus in A.D. 263 were followed
by a period of comparative tranquillity. That
ambitious prince seems to have been content with ruling
from the Tigris to the Mediterranean, and with the
titles of “Augustus,” which he received
from the Roman emperor, Gallienus, and “king
of kings,” which he assumed upon his coins.
He did not press further upon Sapor; nor did the Roman
emperor make any serious attempt to recover his father’s
person or revenge his defeat upon the Persians.
An expedition which he sent out to the East, professedly
with this object, in the year A.D. 267, failed utterly,
its commander, Heraclianus, being completely defeated
by Zenobia, the widow and successor of Odenathus.
Odenathus himself was murdered by a kinsman three
or four years after his great successes; and, though
Zenobia ruled his kingdom almost with a man’s
vigor, the removal of his powerful adversary must
have been felt as a relief by the Persian monarch.
It is evident, too, that from the time of the accession
of Zenobia, the relations between Rome and Palmyra
had become unfriendly; the old empire grew jealous
of the new kingdom which had sprung up upon its borders;
and the effect of this jealousy, while it lasted, was
to secure Persia from any attack on the part of either.