members of Congress had been chosen, and the Legislatures thus chosen elected the United States Senators for the Southern States in accordance with the President’s plan of reconstruction.  To make restoration to the Union full and complete nothing remained to be done but to admit to their seats the Senators and Representatives that had been chosen.  In the mean time these different Legislatures had enacted laws which virtually re-enslaved those that had been emancipated in their respective States.  For this the North would not stand.  Sentiment in that section demanded not only justice and fair treatment for the newly emancipated race but also an emancipation that should be thorough and complete, not merely theoretical and nominal.

The fact was recognized and appreciated that the colored people had been loyal to the Union and faithful to the flag of their country and that they had rendered valuable assistance in putting down the rebellion.  From a standpoint of gratitude, if not of justice, the sentiment of the North at that time was in favor of fair play for the colored people of the South.  But the President would not yield to what was generally believed to be the dominant sentiment of the North on the question of reconstruction.  He insisted that the leaders of the Republican party in Congress did not represent the true sentiment of the country, so he boldly determined to antagonize the leaders in Congress, and to present their differences to the court of public opinion at the approaching Congressional elections.  The issue was thus joined and the people were called upon to render judgment in the election of members of Congress in the fall of 1866.  The President, with the solid support of the Democrats and a small minority of the Republicans, made a brave and gallant fight.  The result, however, was a crushing defeat for him and a national repudiation of his plan of reconstruction.

Notwithstanding this defeat the President refused to yield, continuing the fight with Congress which finally resulted in his impeachment by the House of Representatives for high Crimes and Misdemeanors in office and in his trial by the Senate sitting as a High Court for that purpose.  When the vote of the court was taken the President was saved from conviction and from removal from office by the narrow margin of one vote,—­a sufficient number of Republican Senators having voted with the Democrats to prevent conviction.  It was believed by many at the time that some of the Republican Senators that voted for acquittal did so chiefly on account of their antipathy to the man who would succeed to the Presidency in the event of the conviction of the President.  This man was Senator Benjamin Wade, of Ohio,—­President pro tem. of the Senate,—­who, as the law then stood, would have succeeded to the Presidency in the event of a vacancy in that office from any cause.