fails to obtain the chair of Biblical exegesis at Salamanca, 10;
thwarts the designs of Domingo Banez, 10;
is elected Professor of Theology at Salamanca, 10;
is transferred to the chair of Scholastic
Theology and Biblical
Criticism, 10, 11;
is chosen to be the first editor of St. Theresa’s works, 12;
incurs the enmity of Leon de Castro, 13, 14;
lectures on the Vulgate, 14;
is elected on the committee appointed
to revise Francois Vatable’s
version of the Bible, 15;
threatens to burn Castro’s Commentaria
in Essaiam Prophetam,
16;
out-argues Bartolome de Medina, 18;
goes to Belmonte, 19;
falls ill, 19;
is mentioned as an offender before the
Inquisitionary Committee, 20;
hands in a written statement to the local Inquisition, 21;
his arrest is recommended by that body, 22;
he finds fault with Leon de Castro’s
knowledge of Latin and Greek
and proposes to call witnesses
to prove this point, 33 n.;
quarrels with Medina, 36 n.;
appeals to the Consejo Real at Madrid
and wins his case, 36
n.;
is taken to Valladolid jail by Almansa, 40;
is lodged in the secret cells of the Inquisition, 40;
is nervous about his health, 41;
asks for books, for powders for his heart-attacks,
and for a knife
to cut his food, 41;
is charged with translating into Spanish
the Song of Solomon,
and admits having done so,
42;
implies that a copy may have reached Portugal, 44;
proves a formidable foe, 46;
petitions that his University Chair should
be kept open until the
end of his trial, 47;
his petition is refused and Medina is appointed in his place, 48;
his health suffers from imprisonment,
and he asks for the
companionship of a monk of
his order, 49;
he requests to be transferred to a Dominican Monastery, 50;
petitions for leave to go to confession and to say Mass, 50;
his requests are refused, 50;
the increasing bias of the tribunal against him, 51;
he complains of his bad memory, 51;
his fearless attitude, 52;
he brands all Dominicans as enemies, 52;
objects to the Faculty of Theology at Alcala de Henares, 53;
inveighs against Medina and Castro, 54;
prevents Montoya’s election as Provincial
of the Augustinians in
Spain, 55;
describes Montoya as notorious for lying, 56;
entrusts Arboleda to collect favourable evidence, 56;
brands Diego de Zuniga as a deliberate perjurer, 57;
his criticism on Zuniga’s book, 60;