CHAPTER
I prologue
II close to nature
III boy, bird, and snake
IV growing up with
the country
V grim-visaged
war
VI the Spearing of
Alfred
VII how fiction made fact
VIII new forces at work
IX Mrs. Potiphar
X the building
of the fence
XI settling with Woodell
XII inclination against conscience
XIII Farewell to the fence
XIV A rugged lost sheep
XV A strange world
XVI the really ugly duckling
XVII “Eh, but she’s
winsome”
XVIII the woman
XIX Purgatory
XX two fools
XXI “My little rhinoceros-bird”
XXII two fools still
XXIII just A Pang
XXIV “As to those others”
XXV nature again
XXVI adventures Manifold
XXVII the house wonderful
XXVIII the ape
XXIX the first district
XXX the ninth ward
XXXI their foolish ways
XXXII the law of nature
XXXIII whitest ashes
A MAN AND A WOMAN.
CHAPTER I.
Prologue.
But for a recent occurrence I should certainly not be telling the story of a friend, or, rather, I should say, of two friends of mine. What that occurrence was I will not here indicate—it is unnecessary; but it has not been without its effect upon my life and plans. If it be asked by those who may read these pages under what circumstances it became possible for me to acquire such familiarity with certain scenes and incidents in the lives of one man and one woman,—scenes and incidents which, from their very nature, were such that no third person could figure in them,—I have only to explain that Grant Harlson and I were friends from boyhood, practically from babyhood, and that never, during all our lives together, did a change occur in our relationship. He has told me many things of a nature imparted by one man to another very rarely, and only when each of the two feels that they are very close together in that which sometimes makes two men as one. He was proud and glad when he told me these things—they were but episodes, and often trivial ones—and I was interested deeply. They added the details of a history much of which I knew and part of which I had guessed at.
He was not quite the ordinary man, this Grant Harlson, close friend of mine. He had an individuality, and his name is familiar to many people in the world. He has been looked upon by the tactful as but one of a type in a new nationality—a type with traits not yet clearly defined, a type not large, nor yet, thank God, uncommon—one of the best of the type; to me, the best. A close friend perhaps is blind. No; he is not that: he but sees so clearly that the world, with poorer view, may not always agree with him.